Faites une recherche à travers les informations du Centre du patrimoine mondial.

Administration
Assistance internationale
Budget
Communauté
Communication
Conservation
Convention du patrimoine mondial
Credibilité de la Liste du ...
Inscriptions sur la Liste du ...
Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril
Listes indicatives
Mécanisme de suivi renforcé
Méthodes et outils de travail
Orientations
Partenariats
Rapport périodique
Rapports
Renforcement des capacités
Valeur universelle exceptionnelle








2029 27 GA
2027 26 GA
2025 25 GA
2025 47 COM
2024 46 COM
2023 19 EXT.COM
2023 24 GA
2023 45 COM
2023 18 EXT.COM
2022 17 EXT.COM
2021 16 EXT.COM
2021 23 GA
2021 44 COM
2021 15 EXT.COM
2020 14 EXT.COM
2019 13 EXT.COM
2019 22 GA
2019 43 COM
2018 42 COM
2017 12 EXT.COM
2017 21 GA
2017 41 COM
2016 40 COM
2015 11 EXT.COM
2015 20 GA
2015 39 COM
2014 1 EXT.GA
2014 38 COM
2013 19 GA
2013 37 COM
2012 36 COM
2011 10 EXT.COM
2011 18 GA
2011 35 COM
2010 34 COM
2010 9 EXT.COM
2009 17 GA
2009 33 COM
2008 32 COM
2007 16 GA
2007 8 EXT.COM
2007 31 COM
2006 30 COM
2005 15 GA
2005 29 COM
2005 29 BUR
2004 7 EXT.COM
2004 7 EXT.BUR
2004 28 COM
2004 28 BUR
2003 14 GA
2003 27 COM
2003 27 BUR
2003 6 EXT.COM
2002 26 COM
2002 26 BUR
2001 25 COM
2001 25 EXT.BUR
2001 5 EXT.COM
2001 13 GA
2001 25 BUR
2000 24 COM
2000 24 EXT.BUR
2000 24 BUR(SPE)
2000 24 BUR
1999 23 COM
1999 23 EXT.BUR
1999 4 EXT.COM
1999 12 GA
1999 3 EXT.COM
1999 23 BUR
1998 22 COM
1998 22 EXT.BUR
1998 22 BUR
1997 21 COM
1997 21 EXT.BUR
1997 2 EXT.COM
1997 11 GA
1997 21 BUR
1996 20 COM
1996 20 EXT.BUR
1996 20 BUR
1995 19 COM
1995 19 EXT.BUR
1995 10 GA
1995 19 BUR
1994 18 COM
1994 18 EXT.BUR
1994 18 BUR
1993 17 COM
1993 17 EXT.BUR
1993 9 GA
1993 17 BUR
1992 16 COM
1992 16 BUR
1991 15 COM
1991 8 GA
1991 15 BUR
1990 14 COM
1990 14 BUR
1989 13 COM
1989 7 GA
1989 13 BUR
1988 12 COM
1988 12 BUR
1987 11 COM
1987 6 GA
1987 11 BUR
1986 10 COM
1986 10 BUR
1985 9 COM
1985 5 GA
1985 9 BUR
1984 8 COM
1984 8 BUR
1983 7 COM
1983 4 GA
1983 7 BUR
1982 6 COM
1982 6 BUR
1981 5 COM
1981 1 EXT.COM
1981 5 BUR
1980 3 GA
1980 4 COM
1980 4 BUR
1979 3 COM
1979 3 BUR
1979 2 BUR
1978 2 GA
1978 2 COM
1978 1 BUR
1977 1 COM
1976 1 GA

Décision 7 COM VIII.29
Propositions d'inscription sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial (sites inscrits)

[Uniquement en anglais]

 The Committee examined the nominations to the World Heritage List, taking note of the comments of the representatives of ICOMOS and/or IUCN which had made an evaluation of each property. The Committee decided to enter in the World Heritage List the twenty-nine cultural and natural properties as follows:

Contracting State having submitted the nomination of the property in accordance with the ConventionIdentificationName of PropertyCriteria
Federal Republic of Germany 271 The Pilgrimage Church of Wies C(i)(iii)
Brazil 275 The ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes

It was pointed out that this property belongs to a series of similar properties and that Argentina, on its side, has announced its intention of proposing the Jesuit missions of San Ignacio Mini and Santa Maria la Mayor.

C(iv)
Bulgaria 217 The Ancient City of Nessebar C(iii)(iv)
Bulgaria 216 Rila Monastery

This property was not considered as a testimony of mediaeval civilisation but rather as a symbol of the 19th Century Bulgarian Renaissance which imparted slavic cultural values upon Rila in trying to re-establish an uninterrupted historical continuity. The reconstruction of Rila (1834-1962) thus illustrates cultural criterion (vi) of the Operational Guidelines.

C(vi)
Bulgaria 219 Srebarna Nature Reserve N(iv)
Bulgaria 225 Pirin National Park N(i)(ii)(iii)
Canada 256 Wood Buffalo National Park

The Committee drew attention to the harmful consequences that the eventual construction of a dam on the Slave River could have on those natural characteristics which make the property of outstanding universal value. It therefore recommended that the Canadian authorities take all possible measures to protect the integrity of the site.

N(ii)(iii)(iv)
Costa Rica 205 Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves

The Committee reiterated the Bureau's wish that the Panamanian authorities take the initiative of nominating the part of the Friendship (Amistad) Park located in their territory.

N(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)
Ivory Coast 227 Comoé National Park

The Committee recommended that the authorities should consider extending the protected area to include Mts. Gorowi and Kongoli thus enhancing the ecological and touristic value of this property.

N(ii)(iv)
Ecuador 280 Sangay National Park N(ii)(iii)(iv)
United States of America 259 Great Smoky Mountains National Park N(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)
United States of America 266 La Fortaleza and San Juan Historic Site in Puerto Rico C(iv)
France 229 Place Stanislas, Place de la Carrière and Place d'Alliance,Nancy C(i)(iv)
France 230 Church of Saint-Savin-sur- Gartempe

It was noted that this property becomes part of the series of important groups of Romanesque mural paintings.

C(i)(iii)
France 258 Cape Girolata, Cape Porto and Scandola Nature Reserve in Corsica N(ii)(iii)(iv)
India 242 Ajanta Caves

The Committee recommended that the authorities take all possible safeguarding measures, especially as concerns constructions on the summit of the cliff which could be detrimental for the site.

C(i)(ii)(iii)(vi)
India 243 Ellora Caves

The Committee recommended that the authorities establish a protection zone which would safeguard the surrounding landscape and the cliff, and provide a map indicating the delimitation of this zone.

C(i)(iii)(vi)
India 251 Agra Fort

The Committee recommended that the authorities create a buffer zone of protection between the Fort and the Taj Mahal so as to safeguard the landscape and the environment between these two quite different monuments.

C (iii)
India 252 Taj Mahal C(i)
Peru 273 City of Cuzco

The Committee recommended that the zone of protection be extended to the surroundings of the city in order to include the Canchas and the old Inca villages.

C(iii)(iv)
Peru 274 Santuario historico de Machu Picchu

The Committee noted that this site is inscribed for both its cultural and natural values, as this property also meets natural criteria (ii) and (iii). The Committee furthermore recommended that to enhance the cultural and natural value of this property, the site should be extended to include the lower courses of the Urubamba River and the sites of Pisac and Ollantaytambo in the "Valley of the Gods".

C(i)(iii) N(ii)(iii)
Portugal 206 Central Zone of the Town of Angra do Heroismo (Azores) C(iv)(vi)
Portugal 263 The monastery of the Hieronymites and the Tower of Belem (Lisbon) C(iii)(vi)
Portugal 264 The monastery of Batalha C(i)(ii)
Portugal 265 The convent of Christ (Tomar) C(i)(vi)
Seychelles 261 Vallée de Mai Nature Reserve

The Committee recommended that the Government of the Seychelles should extend this property to include the whole of Praslin National Park and that the management plan for the park (which encompasses the Vallée de Mai) be fully implemented.

N(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)
Switzerland 268 The Convent of St. Gall C(ii)(iv)
Switzerland 269 The Benedictine Convent of St. John at Mustair C(iii)
Switzerland 267 The Old City of Berne

The Old City of Berne was inscribed on the World Heritage List. While taking account of the significant modifications that have been made since its foundation in the 12th Century, the Committee considered that it constituted a positive example of how a mediaeval urban structure can be adapted to fulfill functions which are incresingly complex, notably the function of a capital city of a modern State.

C (iii)
Documents
SC/83/CONF.009/8
Rapport du rapporteur
Contexte de la Décision
SC-83/CONF.009/2
top