Some members questioned several changes made to the original draft text prepared by IUCN. For instance, there had been a change of emphasis from "representative" examples to "outstanding" examples in the different criteria, with which one member did not agree. The same participant found that too much emphasis had been laid on superlative examples (the highest, the largest, etc.). Another member sought to reinsert manageability as a criterion; in reply the IUCN representative considered that this should rather be taken into account at the stage of allocating funds. It was decided that, as for the text on cultural criteria, named examples would be excluded.
Décision 1 COM VI.A(d).34
[Uniquement en anglais] Criteria for the inclusion of cultural properties in the World Heritage List
[Uniquement en anglais]
Code de la Décision1 COM VI.A(d).34
Rapport final - Liste des participants