State of Conservation
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risk of collapse |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cameroon |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cameroon |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/15 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for more effective catchment management in lands adjacent to the Park |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1986 |
Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Rapid economic development |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risks linked to addressing environmental impacts of individual projects to the neglect of monitoring cumulative impacts of the overall development of Ha Long City and other areas surrounding the World Heritage area |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Accident of a crane which damaged one of the most important monuments at Machu Picchu, the Intihuatana or stone sundial |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.7 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Cybernetic fountain; Panaromic lifts to serve the inscribed part from other quarters of the town |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Australia Brazil Cameroon China Colombia Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Germany Greece Guinea Honduras India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Mauritania Morocco Nepal Pakistan Panama Peru Russian Federation Senegal Spain Sweden Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.