Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

18
Reports
18
Properties concerned
17
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2009close
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Deliberate destruction of heritageclose
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Other Threats: Inadequate on-site security and control systems
States Parties: Panama
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Other Threats: Severe deterioration of historic buildings that threatens the Outstanding universal value of the property
States Parties: Belarus
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
States Parties: France
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
States Parties: Hungary
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Other Threats: Lack of conservation of residential housing in the area inscribed as World Heritage
States Parties: Afghanistan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Other Threats: a) Risk of imminent collapse of the Giant Buddha nichesb) Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintingse) Anti-personnel mines and unexploded ordinances (i.e. munitions)
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
States Parties: Yemen
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Other Threats: Serious degradation of the city’s heritage (many houses and the ancient souq are in an alarming deterioration state)
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B,WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Corr
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings, as well as the effect of heavy traffic on historic buildings
States Parties: Chile
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Other Threats: Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction ; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried out
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Other Threats: a) Partial abandonment of the property;
States Parties: Afghanistan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Other Threats: Inclination of the Minaret
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Uzbekistan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
States Parties: Azerbaijan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top