Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Administration
Budget
Capacity Building
Communication
Community
Conservation
Credibility of the World Heritage ...
Inscriptions on the World Heritage ...
International Assistance
List of World Heritage in Danger
Operational Guidelines
Outstanding Universal Value
Partnerships
Periodic Reporting
Reinforced Monitoring
Reports
Tentative Lists
Working methods and tools
World Heritage Convention








175 Decisions
0 Resolutions
KeywordsHIAclose
By Year
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling decisions 33 COM 7A.24 and 34 COM 7A.26 adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Notes with satisfaction the efforts of the State Party to address the threats that led to the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger and encourages the State Party to continue its work on the implementation of the adopted corrective measures, in particular the implementation of a sustained programme for the conservation of the terraces, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 34 COM 7B.4 and 34COM 8B.13, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the progress reported by the State Party in addressing the 2007 and 2008 missions recommendations, and in particular the ban on agriculture and the shift towards a strategy to improve livestock in the property; 4. Considers that the work on livestock improvement should be part of a larger strategy on pastoralism for the property, which takes into account its carrying capacity and which respects ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.46, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the information provided by the State Party on the proposed Port of Lamu at Manda Bay and the Lamu-Addis-Juba-Kigali corridor development project; 4. Expresses its concern that basic detailed information on the project, such as its scope, exact location and scale, the projected kinds of development foreseen, and the projected population growth has not been provided by the State Party as requested by the World Heritage ...
Sites: Lamu Old Town
The World Heritage Committee 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.52, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Reiterates its concern at the potential adverse impact of the approved mining site on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4. Recalls its position on mining and World Heritage and the policy statement of the International Council of Mining and Metals (ICMM); 5. Notes that the State Party has halted mining operations at the mining site 7 km from the property boundary to ensure full compliance with national ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.51, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note of the extensive work in drafting the final Plan for the Protection and Enhancement of the property and its protected area (PPEAS) and requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Centre informed of progress in its implementation; 4. Also takes note of the summary pilot project for the development of the port, but regrets that the requested impact study was not transmitted, and encourages the State Party ...
Sites: Tipasa
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 7B.80 adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007) and 34 COM 7B.68, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Urges the State Party to continue progress in the development of an Integrated Management Plan for the Taj Mahal, and Agra Fort properties, and requests it to submit the plan when completed to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies; 4. Encourages the State Party to continue progress in the development of a separate management plan for ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.72, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the progress made by the State Party in developing the management system for the site and acknowledges the information provided on the actions being taken to implement effective management of the site; 4. Urges the State Party to continue its work to address the actions recommended at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), including: a) implementing an effective heritage impact assessment process within the property, b) ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 27 COM 7B.51, adopted at its 27th session (UNESCO, 2003), 3. Regrets that the State Party has not provided the detailed survey plan on the construction of a new North-South road and mitigation measures to the World Heritage Centre, as requested by the Committee and as requested twice by the World Heritage Centre in 2010; 4. Notes with great concern that construction of the new road has started and progressed rapidly and substantially in 2010, including in Zone 1 and 3 of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.78, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Welcomes the development of the detailed Conservation Management Plan over-arching the existing Management Plans for the two cities and the commitment of the State Party to strengthen the management arrangements for the property through the setting up of a World Heritage office and through reinforcing governmental and other administrative arrangements; 4. Notes the proposals included in the Conservation Management Plan for ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7B.79 and 34 COM 8B.54, adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Notes the efforts and commitment of the State Party for the safeguarding of this property, in particular in undertaking the process of preparation and development of the Integrated Management Plan (IMP); 4. Reiterates its request to the State Party to continue its work on the development of the Integrated Management Plan (IMP), based on the draft Statement of Outstanding ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.76, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Takes note of the conclusions and recommendations of the March 2011 UNESCO international expert advisory mission to the Pashupati Monument Zone of the Kathmandu Valley with respect to the proposed tunnel road construction of 2007 and the proposed Kathmandu International Airport extension; 4. Urges the State Party to abandon its plans for the tunnel road construction crossing the Pashupati monument zone, to determine a road ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.88 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the State Party's efforts to establish clear mechanisms for a coordinated and integrated approach among all decision-making entities and requests the State Party to take the lead in establishing coordination roundtables; 4. Notes with concern that only few recommendations of the 2009 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission have been addressed and reiterates its request to the State Party to take ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7B.89, 33 COM 7B.90 and 34 COM 7B.76, adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party in addition to the 2010 visual impact study; 4. Notes that the Kometgründe project will, if implemented, be carried out according to the request of the World Heritage Committee made at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010) and requests the State Party to inform it of any decisions taken in this ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.97, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Recognises the efforts of the State Party to ensure the protection of the property and the progress being made in the drafting of the site management plan and encourages it to continue these efforts in cooperation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies; 4. Requests the State Party in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, to develop a draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 7B.95, 32 COM 7B.87 and 33 COM 7B.99 adopted at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007), 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, 3. Notes progress in developing a comprehensive management plan, in preparing a draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, and in establishing a Management Committee for the property; 4. Recommends that the State Party include the key points of the resolution of the 2002 Conference held in Tallinn on "Alternatives to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.107 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the reduction in demolition permits in the so-called Jewish quarter; 4. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on progress being made regarding the 'Street of Culture' initiative that aims to act as a model for sustainable development of this area; 5. Also notes with extreme concern the major development proposal in the buffer zone in Pest adjacent to the property boundary that would result in the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Takes notes of the information provided by the State Party in its state of conservation report and notes that it is insufficient to fully judge the nature and quality of the work carried out on the rebuilt Pavilion; 3. Also notes that detailed information concerning the proposed road project was not provided in advance, as required by Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines and that the information available on the road project and the maintenance management of the Park Szczytnicki is insufficient to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 7B.105, 33 COM 7B.118 and 34 COM 7B.95, adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008), 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Deeply regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report, as well as any boundary modification/clarification as requested by the World Heritage Committee and did not address the World Heritage Committee request to extend the buffer zone of the property; 4. Expresses its grave concern that the need to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.97, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Requests the State Party to implement all the recommendations of the 2010 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission, including: a) Establish a series of integrated planning such as urban and development plans, a conservation master plan and a management plan, including tourism strategy, b) Ensure a permanent monitoring of the property with a view of halting and preventing any structural degradation of its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report; 3. Expresses its concern about the apparent lack of monitoring mechanisms and adequate management structures and urges the State Party to develop and implement appropriate legal measures and rules for conservation, restoration and management and use of religious World Heritage properties, as well as to develop a joint management system by establishing a special board including all stakeholders, as well as representatives of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 7B.11, 33 COM 7B.124 and 34 COM 7B.102 adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008), 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Recognises the efforts of the State Party in the preparation of the detailed Impact Assessments for the Golden Horn Bridge carried out by international experts on the basis of the ICOMOS guidance and acknowledges with concern the conclusions that the bridge design it had considered at its last session would have a grave and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.132, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009); 3. Notes the progress made in the implementation of the recommendations made by the 2008 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission; 4. Welcomes the application of the "Guidance on the Protection of Key Views" and the policy on tall buildings included in the Edinburgh Local Plan in 2010 as important tools for the evaluation of future developments; 5. Acknowledges the efforts undertaken in awareness-raising ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Expresses its extreme concern at the proposed development of Liverpool Waters in terms of the potential impact of its dense, high and mid-rise buildings on the form and design of the historic docks and thus on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 3. Notes that the independent Impact Assessment commissioned by English Heritage clearly sets out the significantly damaging negative impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4. Also notes that the proposed development is not in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.110, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the information provided by the State Party regarding the arrangements for implementing the decisions of the World Heritage Committee, recognizes the efforts made by the State Party to ensure the safeguarding of the property and commends the Haitian Institute for the Preservation of the National Heritage (ISPAN) for the work undertaken and the respect of the decisions of the World Heritage Committee; 4. ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.137, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party regarding the measures implemented to address the recommendations made by the World Heritage Committee, and urges it to submit an official management plan, including provisions for public use and risk management and to secure the necessary resources to ensure its full implementation; 4. Also urges the State Party to develop and implement a comprehensive conservation ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.139, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party regarding progress made in the implementation of recommendations made by the World Heritage Committee and the 2009 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission, and requests the State Party to continue with their implementation; 4. Recognizes the efforts made by the State Party in the participatory development of the management plan for the property and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.113, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the efforts made by the State Party to improve the state of conservation of the property, in particular in aspects referring to the management system and the suspension of the implementation of the Cinta Costera project within the property; 4. Also notes the commitment of the State Party to submit for evaluation of the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, all projects, studies and proposals related to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.114, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the efforts made to ensure the conservation of the property, and encourages it to continue with this work in co-operation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies; 4. Notes the submission of the risk preparedness plan, however expresses its concern that the developed plan does not include provisions to address threats and vulnerabilities derived from ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-11/35.COM/8B and WHC-11/35.COM/INF.8B1, 2. Inscribes the Cultural Sites of Al Ain (Hafit, Hili, Bidaa Bint Saud and Oases Areas), United Arab Emirates, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (iii), (iv) and (v); 3. Takes note of the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis Located in the city of Al Ain, on the eastern region of Abu Dhabi Emirate, in the United Arab Emirates, The Cultural Sites of Al Ain comprise the Hafit Assemblage; Hili Assemblage; Bidaa Bint Saud ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-11/35.COM/8B and WHC-11/35.COM/INF.8B1, 2. Inscribes the West Lake Cultural Landscape of Hangzhou, China, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (ii), (iii) and (vi); 3. Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis West Lake is surrounded on three sides by 'cloud-capped hills' and on the fourth by the city of Hangzhou. Its beauty has been celebrated by writers and artists since the Tang Dynasty (AD 618-907). In order to make it more beautiful, its islands, causeways and the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-11/35.COM/8B and WHC-11/35.COM/INF.8B1, 2. Commends the State Party for its excellent work to revise its originally deferred nomination in only three years, closely following the recommendations by ICOMOS and the World Heritage Committee; 3. Inscribes Hiraizumi - Temples, Gardens and Archaeological Sites Representing the Buddhist Pure Land, Japan, with the exception of the component part Yanaginogosho Iseki, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (ii) and (vi); 4. Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-11/35.COM/8B and WHC-11/35.COM/INF.8B1, 2. Inscribes the Prehistoric Pile Dwellings around the Alps, Switzerland, Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (iv) and (v); 3. Adopts the Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief Synthesis The series of 111 out of the 937 known archaeological pile-dwelling sites in six countries around the Alpine and sub-alpine regions of Europe is composed of the remains of prehistoric settlements dating from 5,000 to 500 BC which ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.20, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit the report on the state of conservation of the property as requested; 4. Takes note of the results of the reactive monitoring mission of June 2011, encourages the State Party to implement its recommendations and urges it to prioritize the implementation of the following actions: a)  Develop baseline documentation to carry out a comprehensive condition ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.21, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Regrets that the State Party did not submit the report on the state of conservation of the property as requested; 4.   Takes note of the results of the reactive monitoring mission of June 2011, encourages the State Party to implement its recommendations and urges it to prioritize the implementation of the following actions: a)  Develop baseline documentation, including ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.25, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Regrets that no report was submitted by the State Party, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011); 4.  Notes the production of the first Annual Progress Report (June 2010-June 2011) for the Preparation of a Management Plan for Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley; 5.  Urges the State Party to finalise the Management Plan ...
The World Heritage Committee,  1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7A.24, 34 COM 7A.26 and 35 COM 7A.29 adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009), 34th (Brasilia, 2010) and 35th (UNESCO, 2011) sessions respectively, 3. Commends the State Party for its significant efforts to address the threats that led to the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger and the implementation of the corrective measures; 4. Considers that, in line with the state of conservation report and the findings of the 2011 joint World ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.      Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.      Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.30 adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.      Acknowledges the detailed information provided by the State Party on the progress made to implement the corrective measures and urges the State Party to continue its work on all the corrective measures adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010); 4.      Also urges the State Party to define the buffer zone of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.36 adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Welcomes the progress made by the State Party in addressing the recommendations made by the 2007, 2008 and 2011 missions, particularly in relation to tourism management, control of invasive species, control of poaching and the pastoralism strategy; 4.   Urges the State Party to finalize the Memorandum of Understanding and secure the necessary resources to have a fully operational ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.44, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3.   Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party, notably the development of maps of the property’s boundaries and suggested buffer zone, and requests the State Party to submit the finalized maps in the context of the retrospective inventory and plans of the suggested buffer zone as a minor modification; 4.   Encourages the State Party to finalize the consultation ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.39, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Notes the general information provided by the State Party on the Lamu-Southern Sudan-Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) corridor, Lamu Port development, encroachment and uncontrolled development in the Shela sand dunes and Lamu Old Town; 4.   Expresses its strong concern that detailed information on the LAPSSET corridor and Lamu Port project, such as its scope, projected kinds of primary ...
Sites: Lamu Old Town
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.50, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3.   Commends the State Party for the considerable progress made in improving the state of conservation of the property including the completion of the management plan, the hiring and training of staff, establishment of new zones for residential use to reduce congestion in Macuti Town, the infrastructure projects of sewage and water provision and the increased dialogue over conservation issues ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.44, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Regrets that mining activities were re-started before the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission was able to consider the Heritage Impact Assessment on site; 4.   Requests the State Party to submit the relevant documents to clarify the delineation of the property and of its buffer zone; 5.   Also requests the State Party to ensure that any ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.45, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Notes the information provided by the State Party on the efforts made to improve the conservation and management of the property; 4.   Also notes that the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) has been undertaken on the proposed hotel complex development at Mambo Msiige and the adjacent designated public open space, and that it has been submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.51, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Notes the information provided by the State Party on the implementation of actions at the property and urges it to secure the necessary resources to address holistically pressing concerns at the property and to prioritise the development of a management plan; 4.   Also urges the State Party to finalize the process of definition of a buffer zone for the property, including the ...
Sites: Tyre
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.77 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3.   Acknowledges the submission of the revised urban plan which proposes a buffer zone, as well as priority zones for development; 4.   Notes the suspension of the hotel projects near the Mekong River and requests the State Party to revise these projects in line with the new urban plan and based on full Heritage Impact Assessments; 5.   Regrets that the airport runway ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.72, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Regrets that the State Party did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the property as requested by the World Heritage Committee; 4.   Expresses its concern that infrastructure developments have occurred at the property without heritage impact assessments carried out or without a landscape plan in place and urges the State Party to implement necessary measures to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.74, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Notes the progress in developing the Integrated Management Plan (IMP) as well as the conservation measures taken for the property; 4.   Requests the State Party to continue its work on the finalization of the Integrated Management Plan (IMP), and to continue its commitment to not approving any development project within the property or in the adjacent areas identified as having ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.75, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Takes note of the results of the November 2011 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to the property; 4.   Welcomes the cancellation of the tunnel road construction; 5.   Urges the State Party to propose an alternative new route by determining a trajectory which passes around and outside the property boundary and to mitigate urgently the road ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.78, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Regrets that no state of conservation report has been submitted by the State Party since 2009 despite the requests of the Committee at its 34th and 35th sessions and notes that the concerns raised by the 2010 reactive monitoring mission remain unaddressed; 4.   Also notes the submission of the Galle Management Plan (2010) by the State Party, and urges the State Party to continue ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.80, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Welcomes the progress made by the State Party in the preparation of the Management Plan and encourages the State Party to continue its cooperation with Ministry of Culture, local authorities, the World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS to finalize the Management Plan for submission by 1 February 2013 for review by ICOMOS; 4.   Requests the State Party to ensure that the Management Plan ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.77, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3.   Takes note of the progress made by the State Party in addressing concerns raised in prior sessions of World Heritage Committee and urges it to secure the necessary resources for the sustained operation of the management system currently in place and for the implementation of prescribed priority conservation and rehabilitation actions; 4.   Expresses its serious concern about ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.84, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3.   Takes note of the information provided by the State Party in response to the concerns raised by the revision of the Architectural, Urban, and Landscape Heritage Protection Zones (ZPPAUP) and their possible transformation into architecture and heritage enhancement areas (AVAP) before 15 July 2015; 4.   Notes with satisfaction of the convention between the State and the Town of Provins concluded on 9 December 2004, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Welcomes the State Party's allocation of funding for the conservation of the property; 3.   Commends the State Party for its decision to abandon the construction of a waste dump in the Corcolle area; 4.   Requests the State Party to inform the World Heritage Centre in due time about any major development project planned in the buffer zone of the property, including the housing development at Comprensorio di Ponte Lucano, for which a Heritage Impact Assessment ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decisions 31 COM 7B.114, 32 COM 7B.98 and 34 COM 7B.91 adopted at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007), 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3.   Welcomes the submission of the first joint report by the two States Parties; 4.   Recognizes the efforts made by both States Parties to ensure the safeguarding of the property and encourages them to continue such efforts in cooperation with the World Heritage Centre and the ...
Sites: Curonian Spit
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.114, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3.   Welcomes the progress made in updating and adopting the Management Plan; 4.   Requests the State Party to submit three printed and electronic copies of the revised Management Plan, including information how the issue of tourism pressure is addressed, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies; 5.   Takes note that the State Party has submitted a draft ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36 COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.101 adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Takes note of the results of the mission concerning the overall improved state of conservation of the property but notes certain shortcomings in the quality of works on the Main Restaurant Pavilion and urges the State Party to ensure higher standards during future works; 4.   Requests the State Party to provide to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies, full ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decision 25 COM X.A, adopted at its 25th session (Helsinki, 2001), 3.   Notes with concern the conclusions of the ICOMOS advisory mission that the potential impacts of the Foz Tua Hydro-electric Dam Project on the property and its setting would cause irreversible damage to the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4.   Also notes with concern that initial planning processes for this project have not taken full account of the World Heritage status ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.103, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Expresses its concern at the impact of a considerable number of major projects completed in recent years in the property and its buffer zone on the overall urban silhouette and on the harmonious relationship of the 16th- 18th century buildings within their planned urban surroundings; 4.   Notes the highly negative impact of the reconstructed Cathedral of the Assumption on the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.104, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Notes the conclusions of the International expert forum on boundary issues held in Saint Petersburg regarding the establishment of an international open-ended group of experts on boundary issue; 4.   Welcomes the efforts of the State Party deployed for cancelation of the “Okhta-Center” tower project, also notes the development of a new skyscraper project of the Lakhta ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.107 adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report and has not otherwise provided information on the implementation of its decision; 4.   Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre detailed information concerning the Master Plan of the Solovetsky Monastery and any other planning documents prior to the mission; 5.   ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7B.123, 34 COM 7B.100, 35 COM 7B.110, adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009), 34th (Brasilia, 2010) and 35th (UNESCO, 2011) sessions respectively, 3.   Regrets that work on the Torre Pelli-Cajasol has not been suspended, as requested by the Committee at its last session, and that no discussions or consultations have been undertaken to consider how the project could be improved and any possible impact further reduced; 4.   Notes with ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.112, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Expresses its grave concern at the degradation of the panorama along the Dnieper river and that the ongoing construction of high-rise buildings could affect the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4.   Reiterates its requests to the State Party to impose a moratorium on all high-rise buildings, to implement, in coordination with the City Administration all necessary ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 30 COM 8B.50, adopted at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006), 3.   Expresses its utmost concern that full details of the resumption of mining at South Crofty were submitted to the World Heritage Centre after planning consent had been issued, contrary to the request of the World Heritage Committee at the time of inscription, and considers that these projects should be halted until an assessment has been made of their impacts; 4.   Takes note that mining within World Heritage ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.121, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Takes note of the results of the 2012 reactive monitoring mission to the property, endorses its recommendations and requests the State Party to implement them, with priority actions on the following processes: a)  Ensure that the original characteristics, spirit and scale of the original project designed by Lucio Costa, which warranted inscription on the World Heritage List, are ...
Sites: Brasilia
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.125 adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Takes note of the information provided by the State Party concerning the steps taken to implement the World Heritage Committee Decisions, and recognizes the efforts deployed by the Institut de Sauvegarde du Patrimoine National (ISPAN )to ensure the safeguarding of the property; 4.   Thanks the Government of Spain and the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.126, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Notes that no direct impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the inscribed property is to be expected from the construction of the Rio Amarillo Aerodrome and requests the State Party, should a decision be made to proceed with its construction, to update the Environmental Impact Assessment and carry out a Heritage Impact Assessment to identify mitigation measures; 4.   ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.130, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Reiterates its deep concern regarding the state of conservation of the property, in particular unaddressed issues including the efficacy of the management system, the risk of collapse of historic buildings in the Historic Centre and the potential impacts related to the Cinta Costera project; 4.   Also recalls the report provided by the reactive monitoring mission of October ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.132, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Takes note of the information provided by the State Party regarding work carried out at the property and expresses its concern that many of the required actions to ensure the holistic conservation and protection of the property have remained in planning stages since 2008; 4.   Urges the State Party to implement the following activities: a)  Finalize the risk preparedness ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Documents WHC-12/36.COM/8B and WHC-12/36.COM/INF.8B2, 2.   Inscribes the Chengjiang Fossil Site, China, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criterion (viii); 3.  Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis The Chengjiang Fossil Site, located in the Province of Yunnan, China, conserves fossil remains which are of exceptional significance. The rocks and fossils of the Chengjiang Fossil Site present an outstanding and extraordinarily preserved record that testifies to the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Documents WHC-12/36.COM/8B and WHC-12/ 36.COM/INF.8B2, 2.   Inscribes the Western Ghats, India, on the World Heritage List, on the basis of criteria (ix) and (x); 3.   Adopts the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis The Western Ghats are internationally recognized as a region of immense global importance for the conservation of biological diversity, besides containing areas of high geological, cultural and aesthetic values. A chain of mountains running parallel ...
Sites: Western Ghats
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Documents WHC-12/36.COM/8B and WHC-12/36.COM/INF.8B1, 2.   Refers the nomination of Al Zubarah Archaeological Site, Qatar, back to the State Party, in order to allow it to: a)   Further develop its understanding of how the fabric of Al Zubarah and its desert hinterland were an exceptional testimony to a specific interaction between nomadic herders, pearl divers, fishermen and traders that once characterised the way of life in the Gulf by: (i)   Presenting the results of surveys and excavations ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-12/36.COM/8B and WHC-12/36.COM/INF.8B1, 2. Inscribes the Masjed-e Jāmé of Isfahan, Iran (Islamic Republic of), on the World Heritage List, on the basis of criterion (ii); 3. Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis Masjed-e Jāme’ is the oldest Friday (congregational) mosque in Iran, located in the historical centre of Isfahan. The monument illustrates a sequence of architectural construction and decorative styles of different periods in Iranian Islamic architecture, covering 12 ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-17/37.COM/7A, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7A.22 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Urges the State Party to pursue its efforts in implementing the recommendations of the 2011 reactive monitoring mission, and to prioritize the implementation of the following actions: a)  Develop baseline documentation, including missing architectural plans and topographic surveys, carry out a detailed conservation condition survey, b)  Undertake identified ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7A, 2.   Recalling Decision 36 COM 7A.26, adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.   Commends the progress made by the State Party on the implementation of the corrective measures and on capacity building; 4.   Takes note of the concerns expressed by the State Party on the critical condition of the large Western Buddha niche; 5.   Urges the State Party to: a)   finalise the Management Plan with an overall strategy of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7C , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Regrets that the State Party did not keep the Committee fully informed about the Runkerry golf resort development prior to any decisions being taken that are difficult to reverse, in line with paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines ; 4.  Reiterates its request to the State Party to halt the proposed golf resort development project until its potential impact on the Outstanding ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 31 COM 8B.54 , adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), 3.  Expresses its grave concern regarding the Alembe-Mikouyi Road Development Project that could have an impact on the property, as well as the lack of information provided to the World Heritage Centre concerning the implementation of the main recommendations of Decision 31 COM 8B.54 , notably those regarding the establishment of a management authority, the approval of the law on the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 20 COM 7D.64/65 , adopted at its 20th session (Merida, 1996), 3.  Expresses its concern over the Kuraz Sugar Cane Development Projects, which may have a negative impact on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Lower Valley of the Omo, if located within or near the property; 4.  Regrets that the State Party has not replied to the World Heritage Centre’s letters regarding its official position and clarification on the projects and their ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.43, adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Takes note of the documentation submitted by the State Party in regard to the Lamu Port – South Sudan – Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) corridor and the new Lamu Port and Metropolis Development Project and also for the Management Plan for the property; 4.  Reiterates its deep concern about the likely negative impact of the LAPSSET corridor and the new Lamu Port and ...
Sites: Lamu Old Town
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.48 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Acknowledges that archaeological advice will be provided to oversee the mitigation measures associated with the impact of open-cast coal mining on archaeological sites associated with the Mapungubwe Kingdom; 4.  Notes the progress made in establishing a buffer zone for the property that will cover land to the east of the boundary, and progress with the establishment of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7B.51 and 35 COM 7B.46 , adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009) and 35th (UNESCO, 2011) sessions respectively, 3.  Takes note of the progress made by the State Party in implementing the plan for the protection and enhancement of the property and its protected area; 4.  Also takes note of the State Party’s invitation of an advisory mission to the property and reiterates its request to submit to the World Heritage Centre an ...
Sites: Tipasa
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.47 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Takes note of the information provided by the State Party concerning measures taken to protect the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, and commend s its commitment for securing substantial funding for the urgently needed rehabilitation and conservation work on the urban fabric; 4.  Encourages the State Party to continue its efforts through the implementation of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.49 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the implementation of conservation and management measures to address existing conditions at the property; 4.  Urges the State Party to sustain on-going efforts, with particular attention to the following: a)  Finalize the delineation of the buffer zone and develop adequate regulatory measures to ensure its protection, ...
Sites: Petra
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.52 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Acknowledges the comprehensive information provided by the State Party on the implementation of actions to address pressing conservation and management concerns and urges it to continue with the systematic implementation of the 2012-2014 Action Plan; 4.  Takes note of the September 2012 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission and also urges that the ...
Sites: Tyre
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.62 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Regrets that the State Party has not submitted a state of conservation report that addresses the recommendations of the World Heritage Committee at its 36th session; 4.  Notes the results of the May 2013 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to the property and encourages the State Party to implement its recommendations, with particular attention ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 8B.23 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Regrets that the State Party did not provide a state of conservation report as requested; 4.  Reiterates its requests to the State Party to urgently revise the Meydan-e Atiq project, in particular its north-western corner in the immediate vicinity of the Masjed-e Jāmé of Isfahan, in a way that will: a)  not foresee any structural connection between the new galleries and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Takes note of the information provided by the State Party, in particular concerning the actions that have been taken to reduce the potential negative impact of the new mosque construction on the setting of the property; 3.  Requests the State Party to: a)  Submit detailed drawings of the latest mosque design, including the proposed exterior infrastructure, to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies, b)  Involve key stakeholders, including national ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B,  2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.66 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Welcomes the State Party’s progress in finding an alternative route for the new Tilganga-Tamranganga tunnel and road; 4.  Encourages the State Party to submit details of alternative routes for the road to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, at the earliest opportunity, preferably at the concept stage and before irreversible commitments are made; 5.  Notes the adoption of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decisions 34 COM 7B.72 , 35 COM 7B.78 and 36 COM 7B.68, adopted at its 34th (Brasilia, 2010), 35th (UNESCO, 2011) and 36th (Saint-Petersburg, 2012) sessions respectively, 3.  Regrets that the State Party has provided limited or no response to the decisions of the Committee and expresses its concern that no details have been given on the following: a)  the revised port development project and its Heritage Impact Assessment or of its proposed ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.82 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Notes the details of illegal buildings provided by the State Party for both Berat and Gjirokastra, and expresses its serious concern about its scale in Gjirokastra and the lack of progress in developing and implementing an Action Plan to deal with these violations; 4.  Also notes the lack of adequate legal tools that would stop illegal interventions, urges the State Party to approve and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.84 adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Notes that a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to the property took place in September 2012 and requests the State Party to implement the recommendations of the mission; 4.  Takes note of the information provided by the State Party on 31 May 2013 concerning the new project proposed in and around the Intercontinental Hotel, urges the State Party to provide the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.83 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Notes the results of the April 2013 ICOMOS advisory mission to the property, invited by the State Party; 4.  Takes note of the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the hydroelectric power plant Lehne and information provided by the State Party concerning a number of proposed new projects which may constitute negative impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV); 5.  ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.87 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Welcomes the progress made by the State Party in the implementation of its previous decisions and urges the State Party to adopt and implement the Management Plan; 4.  Takes note of the results of the November 2012 ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to the property and requests the State Party to implement its recommendations, in particular: a)  Approve effective legislative and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.92 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Welcomes the important progress in identifying micro-organisms responsible for the mould outbreak, and in stabilising of the atmospheric conditions through limiting access; 4.  Notes that these steps forward will be followed by further work on the hydro-climatic conditions starting in 2013, for the recording and mapping of areas most severely affected, which could lead to development of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.95 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Notes the recent withdrawal of demolition and development schemes in the Jewish quarter and Becsi Street but notes with concern the deteriorating condition of existing historic buildings; 4.  Welcomes the new World Heritage legislation that took effect on 1 January 2012, and the statutory underpinning of World Heritage management plans; 5.  Also notes the reorganization ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.77 adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Takes note of the emergency response provided by the State Party and commends the authorities for the steps undertaken for the safeguarding of the property; 4.  Notes that a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS advisory mission to the property, invited by the State Party, took place in October 2012; 5.  Requests the State Party to implement the recommendations of the mission ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.81 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Takes note of the conclusions and recommendations of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/IUCN reactive monitoring mission, and thanks the Director-General of UNESCO for endorsing the recommendations of the mission; 4.  Notes with satisfaction the comprehensive documentation provided by the State Party in response to the mission’s recommendations; 5.  Requests ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.83 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Notes the progress made by the State Party in the conservation and protection of the Church of the Transfiguration and on the Church of the Intercession and urges it to sustain these efforts in timely manner and secure the necessary resources to ensure that no further loss of fabric and design features, which could constitute a threat to the property, occurs; 4.  Takes note of ...
Sites: Kizhi Pogost
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.84 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report in 2012 or 2013 despite the requests of the Committee at its 35th and 36th sessions and that therefore the concerns raised by the 2012 reactive monitoring mission have not been addressed; 4.  Urges the State Party to strengthen the national and regional legislative and regulatory protection for the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decisions 35 COM 7B.107 and 36 COM 7B.86 adopted at its 35th (UNESCO, 2011) and 36th (Saint-Petersburg, 2012) sessions respectively, 3.  Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report; 4.  Takes note of the steps the State Party is making towards developing legal measures for the protection of World Heritage cultural properties, as well as for the establishment of a “Committee on the conservation of the spiritual, cultural and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 35COM 7B.105 adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Takes note of the efforts the State Party is making towards to developing legal measures for the protection of World Heritage properties; 4.  Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report; 5.  Reiterates its request to the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines , all project ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.88 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Notes the progress with finalising and approving Special Protection Plans for sectors of the Conjunto Histórico, due for completion in 2013; 4.  Also notes that the buffer zone will be completely covered by these Plans which should provide it with adequate protection; 5.  Further notes that for the wider setting, the local authorities will be tasked with establishing ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.89 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Take notes of the results of the 2012 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission and requests the State Party to implement its recommendations and to duly proceed with the annual review of the Management Plan; 4.  Acknowledges the commitment of the State Party to halt work on the Golden Horn Bridge for a year in order to consider ways of further improving its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.113 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Acknowledges the halting of the development of the Citadel and Bernadine monastery, the adoption of the Integrated Concept for the Redevelopment of the Centre of L´viv and of the Regulations for placing announcements in the city of L’viv, and the completion of the digitised mapping of the property; 4.  Takes note of the 2012 reactive monitoring mission and urges the State Party ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.90 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Notes that a moratorium on all high-rise and non-conforming buildings is under consideration by Kiev City Council and supported by the Ministry of Culture and reiterates its request to the State Party to implement such a moratorium and to take all necessary measures, including the development of appropriate regulations to ensure that there are no adverse impacts to the Outstanding ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.123 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the actions carried out in response to the decisions made by the World Heritage Committee and urges the State Party to continue its work, with particular attention to: a)  Formal establishment of the buffer zone at Santo Domingo East and approval of regulations for construction heights, b)  Approval and implementation of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.124 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2010), 3.  Takes notes of the information provided by the State Party on the actions implemented in terms of enhancing the conservation and management of the property; 4.  Also takes note of the submission by the State Party of a Heritage Impact Assessment, including technical, environmental and social studies concerning the option of the two metro stations in the historical centre; 5.  ...
Sites: City of Quito
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.100 , adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Takes note of the information provided concerning the actions being implemented for the conservation of the property, and the decision made by the State Party to proceed with the construction of the aerodrome at Rio Amarillo and requests the State Party to ensure that the construction of the runway be limited to 1200 meters in order to avoid any possible impacts on the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B, 2.  Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.104, adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 3.  Takes note of the information provided by the State Party on the actions taken to implement the recommendations made by the World Heritage Committee and reiterates its concern that measures to ensure the conservation and protection of the property continue to be at the planning stages; 4.  Reiterates its request to the State Party to finalize the following documents for submission to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.134, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Acknowledges the efforts made by the State Party in the implementation of the recommendations made by the 2010 reactive monitoring mission and encourages it to continue with these efforts, in particular regarding the establishment of a fully functional and resourced management system for the property; 4.  Takes note of large scale projects being implemented and requests the State Party ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Documents WHC-13/37.COM/8B, WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B1 and WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B2 , 2.  Approves the extension of uKhahlamba / Drakensberg Park, South Africa , to include Sehlabathebe National Park, Lesotho, to become the Maloti-Drakensberg Park, Lesotho/South Africa , on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (i), (iii), (vii) and (x) ; 3.  Adopts the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis The uKhahlamba Drakensberg Park is renowned for its spectacular ...
he World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Documents WHC-13/37.COM/8B.Add and WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B1.Add, 2.  Inscribes Al Zubarah Archaeological Site, Qatar, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (iii), (iv) and (v) ; 3.  Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis The walled coastal town of Al Zubarah in the Arabian Gulf flourished as a pearling and trading centre for a short period of some fifty years in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Founded by Utub merchants from Kuwait, its prosperity ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Documents WHC-13/37.COM/8B and WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B1 , 2.  Inscribes Levuka Historical Port Town , Fiji , on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (ii) and (iv) ; 3.  Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis Levuka Historical Port Town is set amongst coconut and mango trees along the beach front of Ovalau Island against the forested slopes of the island’s extinct volcano. From the 1820s onwards the port was developed as a centre of commercial ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Documents WHC-13/37.COM/8B WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B.1 and WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B.4 , 2.  Inscribes the University of Coimbra – Alta and Sofia, Portugal , on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (ii), (iv) and (vi) ; 3.  Adopts the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis Situated on a hill overlooking the city, the University of Coimbra-Alta and Sofia has grown and evolved over more than seven centuries to form its own well-defined urban area of two ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.58, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Acknowledges the continuing vulnerability of the property as a result of the extreme conditions that have prevailed in Sana’s over the past four years; Nonetheless welcomes the positive progress that has been possible and in particular the adoption of a new law in August 2013 on the protection of historic sites, monuments, cities and their urban and cultural heritage; the Prime Minister’s Decree for the endorsement of the urgent ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add, Takes note of the information submitted by the State Party regarding the comprehensive redevelopment of the Ancient Panchi area that is currently underway within the buffer zone of the property; Expresses its concern about the potential impacts that this project may have on the attributes that sustain the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, including its authenticity and integrity; Strongly urges the State Party to inform the Committee, through the World Heritage Centre, about the full scope ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.70, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011); Notes the progress of the State Party in strengthening legislative protection and development control measures for the property through the environmental impact assessment regulations now in place for the Sragen Regency, and seeks assurance that these measures have been adopted throughout the property; Urges the State Party to establish the Integrated Management Bureau for the property to enhance coordinated management and to draw up ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.64, adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), Notes the progress made in developing the Integrated Management Framework document and its Management Plan, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), as well as conservation measures taken for the property; Also notes the awareness raising efforts undertaken by the State Party, notably in the publication of two books on Lumbini and the development of the UNDP/UNESCO brochure to raise funds for the completion of the Kenzo ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decisions 34 COM 7B.72, 35 COM 7B.78, 36 COM 7B.68 and 37 COM 7B.67 adopted at its 34th (Brasilia, 2010), 35th (UNESCO, 2011), 36th (Saint-Petersburg, 2012) and 37th (Phnom Penh) sessions respectively, Acknowledges that the State Party has provided further information on the proposed Port project including cross sections and photo-montages, but regrets that these have not been submitted in sufficient detail to allow a full assessment of the potential impact of the proposed port on the Outstanding ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decision 22 COM VII.17, adopted at its 22nd session (Kyoto, 1998), Takes note of the information submitted by the State Party regarding the large project planned for the plateau of Mount Srđ and Bosanka in the vicinity of the World Heritage property; Requests the State Party to provide the project documentation and the respective heritage impact assessment (HIA) before any development works have started and any final decision has been taken in line with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.79 adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), Welcomes the actions undertaken by the State Party for improving the legal and management arrangements for the property and for the implementation of the recommendations from the 2013 advisory mission; Encourages the State Party to continue its efforts with particular attention to the following; Ensure the sustained operation and resourcing of the management system, particularly by formally designating the newly created ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B; Recalling Decisions 36 COM 7B.94 and 37 COM 7B.89, adopted at its 36th (Saint-Petersburg, 2012) and 37th (Phnom Penh, 2013) sessions respectively, Notes the information provided by the State Party in January 2014; Takes note of the recommendations of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM reactive monitoring mission to the property in October 2013 and requests the State Party to give highest priority to the implementation of its recommendations; Expresses its concern at the recent flooding at the ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.95, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Appreciates the efforts made by the State Party to fund and organize the Advisory mission conducted in November 2013 and encourages it to implement the recommendations contained in the mission report; Takes note of the work undertaken by the national and municipal authorities, and the contributions from sectors of civil society, to elaborate a Management Plan and promote the conservation of the property and encourages the State ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined document WHC-14/38.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.98 adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013); Recognizes the extreme social, economic and environmental vulnerabilities facing the State Party and by extension the impacts on its heritage assets; Welcomes the measures taken by the State Party to implement the decisions of the World Heritage Committee, and acknowledges the efforts of the Institute for the Protection of National Heritage to ensure the safeguard of the property, as well as the ongoing efforts to raise awareness ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.101, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Takes note of the significant progress made by the State Party in addressing the final delimitation of boundaries and buffer zone, and the completion of the Risk preparedness plan and the Master Plan of the Historic Centre of Arequipa; Urges the State Party to complete the process of final approval and implementation of the new boundaries for the property as well as for its Master Plan and Risk preparedness plan; Invites the ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.39, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Welcomes the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) on the potential impacts of the Ethiopian Sugar Development Corporation Project (Kuraz project) on the Lower Omo Valley; Notes that this HIA indicates the potential for massive adverse impacts on the property from the irrigation and excavations associated with the development of sugar plantations, settlements and access routes, and also notes that there is conflicting information on ...
Decision: 38 COM 7B.49 The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decisions 34 COM 7B.46, 35 COM 7B.39, 36 COM 7B.43 and 37 COM 7B.40, adopted at its 34th (Brasilia, 2010), 35th (UNESCO, 2011), 36th (Saint-Petersburg, 2012) and 37th (Phnom Penh, 2013) sessions respectively, Strongly regrets that the Lamu Port – South Sudan – Ethiopia Transport (LAPSSET) Corridor Development Authority project was not halted, and reiterates its request to the State Party to halt all work on the LAPSSET development project until the Heritage Impact Assessment ...
Sites: Lamu Old Town
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.49 adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), Deeply regretsthat in spite of extensive dialogue among the State Party, the Advisory Bodies and the World Heritage Centre, a new hotel and internal alterations at the Mambo Msiige building were carried out in contravention of the agreed upon matrix and guidelines for a revised design; and considers that the new six storey hotel, at two stories above the agreed matrix and guidelines, and encroaching onto the public beach, ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decision 22 COM VII.30 and 33 COM 8B.40 adopted at its 22nd (Kyoto, 1998) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, Welcomes the actions undertaken by the State Party in response to the recommendations made by the 2013 Advisory Mission related to the project for the Instauration of St. Clement’s University at Plaoshnik and recommends that dialogue between the State Party and the Advisory Bodies continue as the project progresses further; Encourages the State Party to implement all ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.33, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Commends the State Party for its efforts to monitor the property and perform regular patrols in spite of limited human resources, and urges the State Party to take measures to significantly increase the number of surveillance staff for the property, including staff trained in cultural heritage; Expresses its concern that the proposed upgrading of the Alembé-Mikouyi Road could impact on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.35 adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), Commends the State Party for the progress achieved in addressing the escalating threat of poaching, particularly affecting elephant populations; Welcomes the establishment of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority (NCAA) and the Department of Antiquities and the proposed integration of the cultural department in the operational structure of the property, and urges the State Party to ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-14/38.COM/8B and WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes Rani-ki-Vav (The Queen’s Stepwell) at Patan, Gujarat, India, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (i) and (iv); Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis Rani-ki-Vav is an exceptional example of a distinctive form of subterranean water architecture of the Indian subcontinent, the stepwell, which is located on the banks of the Saraswati River in Patan. Initially built as a memorial in the 11th century CE, the stepwell was ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-14/38.COM/8B and WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes Pergamon and its Multi-Layered Cultural Landscape, Turkey, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (vi); Takes note of the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis Pergamon was founded in the 3rd century B.C. Its location in the Aegean Region, the heart of the Antique World, and at the crossroads between Europe and the Middle East destined it to be an important cultural, scientific and political ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7A, Recalling Decision 38 COM 7A.1, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014), Commends the State Party for its efforts in the implementation of measures at the property and encourages it to sustain these efforts to protect and conserve the property and its buffer zone; Urges the State Party to continue with the implementation of the corrective measures, with particular attention to the following: Undertake detailed condition surveys to identify priority interventions to ensure stabilization of ...
Sites: Abu Mena
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add, Recalling Decision 38 COM 7A.15, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014), Regrets that no updated state of conservation report has been submitted by the State Party, in particular regarding recent large scale of development projects; Reiterates that the World Heritage Committee shall be notified prior to any major restoration and or new construction which may affect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property before making any decisions that would be difficult to reverse in accordance to ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7A, Recalling Decision 38 COM 7A.17, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014), Welcomes the efforts made by the State Party to improve the protection of all components of the property and its buffer zone and, more particularly, introducing a moratorium on any development in the zone next to the Aragvi and Mtgvari rivers banks declared as a non aedeficandi zone until the Urban Land-Use Master Plan and unified buffer zone are approved and implemented to curb uncontrolled development; Notes with appreciation that an ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 38 COM 7B.59, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014), Commends the decision of the State Party to progress a bypass for National Highway 3 to the north of the property; however, notes that the four possible route options might pass through sensitive archaeological areas, and urges the State Party to undertake a detailed Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs) in line with ICOMOS’ guidance on HIAs, including an assessment of impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, as a ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 8B.18, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Welcomes the commencement, by the State Party of Lesotho, of new research and documentation of rock art within Sehlabathebe National Park, building on the Analysis of Rock Art in Lesotho (ARAL) project, as well as the study on the landscape elements, encompassing both ethnographic research and oral history, in order to identify their potential contribution to Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), and encourages the State Party of ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decisions 34 COM 8B.13, 36 COM 7B.35 and 38 COM 7B.61, adopted at its 34th (Brasilia, 2010), 36th (Saint-Petersburg, 2012) and 38th (Doha, 2014) sessions respectively, Welcomes the establishment of the Cultural Heritage Department within the Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority (NCAA) and encourages the State Party to continue allocating adequate resources for its long-term operation; Notes the decision to relocate the lodge development projects from the crater rim to other areas that the State ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decisions 34 COM 7B.46, 35 COM 7B.39, 36 COM 7B.43, 37 COM 7B.40 and 38 COM 7B.49, adopted at its 34th (Brasilia, 2010), 35th (UNESCO, 2011), 36th (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 37th (Phnom Penh, 2013) and 38th (Doha, 2014) sessions respectively, Notes that the February 2015 Reactive Monitoring mission had to take place in Nairobi due to the security situation in Lamu; Regrets that, despite reporting to the contrary, the State Party did not halt the LAPSSET project in order to allow time for a full ...
Sites: Lamu Old Town
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decision 32 COM 8B.18, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), Notes the efforts made by the State Party to enforce the various legislative and planning frameworks, as requested by the Committee at the time of inscription, and reminds the State Party to ensure that new development projects that might impact on Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) should be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review, as set out in Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, together with Heritage ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision COM 7B.44 adopted as its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Commends the State Party on activities so far undertaken to improve water management on the property, and encourages it to continue with the implementation of all relevant measures and projects; Also commends the State Party for the measures so far undertaken to implement systems and programmes to mitigate the impacts of acid mining drainage on the property, and also encourages the State Party to sustain these efforts; Requests the ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decisions 35 COM 7B.45, 36 COM 7B. 49, and 38 COM 7B.55, adopted at its 35th (UNESCO, 2011), 36th (Saint-Petersburg, 2012) and 38th (Doha, 2014) sessions respectively, Deeply regrets that the State Party did not halt work on the Mambo Msiige project as requested in the abovementioned decisions, and allowed the developer to complete the project without taking into account the recommendations of the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) and the jointly agreed upon matrix and guidelines for a revised ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.45, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Takes note of the continuing progress made in implementing the plan for the protection and enhancement of the property and its protected area; Reiterates its request to the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre an assessment of the impact of the proposed enhancement of Tipasa’s port on the property, in line with the ICOMOS Guidance on Heritage Impact Assessments for Cultural World Heritage Properties, before work ...
Sites: Tipasa
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decisions 37 COM 7B.47 and 38 COM 8B.49, adopted at the 37th (Phnom Penh, 2013) and 38th (Doha, 2014) sessions respectively, Notes the completion and implementation of the comprehensive management and conservation plan; Also notes the delay in the reviewing of the proposed revision of the Heritage Law, as well as in the signature of memoranda of understanding with the owners of lands located within the area designated for the extension of the World Heritage property, and in the revision of ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.48, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Noting the maintenance and restoration works carried out at the property, as well as proposed site development activities outlined in the state of conservation report, Expresses its concern about the factors affecting the property and the seeming lack of a comprehensive policy, which constitutes a threat to the integrity of the property; Urges the State Party to develop, as a matter of priority, an integrated management plan for ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.52, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Welcomes the progress that has been made with a number of management and conservation measures which were addressed by the Committee at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), as well as the submission of an updated Action Plan for the management and conservation of the property; Also welcomes the partnership agreement with the Italian Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities and the Tunisian Heritage Institute, which will ...
Sites: Tyre
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 38 COM 7B.58, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014), Notes with great concern that the Old City of Sana’a continues to be vulnerable owing to the deteriorating security situation in Yemen, in combination with ongoing social change, threats of inappropriate development and continuing lack of organisational support and resources for both heritage management initiatives and physical conservation projects; Commends the State Party for the preparation of the draft ‘National Strategy for the ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 8B.25, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Commends the efforts made by the State Party in responding to all the recommendation made by the Committee, notably: Revising and including the concept of buffer zone management for World Heritage properties, as well as potential future sites in Fiji within the Fiji Heritage Bill, Progressing with the medium term plan for conservation and cooperating with Heritage New Zealand (New Zealand Agency for International Development) ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.61, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Notes the efforts undertaken to remove the remains of the collapsed bridge and welcomes the impact assessment study for the new location of the bridge; Also welcomes the development of the Integrated Management Plan (IMP) for Hampi World Heritage Site - Action Plans for Priority Implementation and urges the State Party to finalize all Sectoral Plans as well as an overall prioritization and synthesis and adopt as soon as possible ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decision 38 COM 7B.14, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014), Commends the State Party for having invited an Advisory mission to share concerns and issues raised by the Committee; and notes that the commitments made at the time of inscription for effective management to protect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property still remain high; Notes with concern that the pressure for land conversion remains significant, creating a considerable vulnerability that is challenging the ability ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.62, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Commends the efforts made by the State Party to implement the previous Committee decisions, in particular the completed works on the reduction of the upper floor on the Jahan Nama building; Notes the results of the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) on the Metro Line 2 and request the State Party to implement the detailed mitigation measures recommended by the HIA; Welcomes the State Party’s commitment to put in place a continuous ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 31 COM 7B.87, adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), Notes the information provided by the State Party on the works envisaged within the “Programme for complex measures for development and reconstruction of Shakhrisyabz City”; Expresses its concern about the overall impact of the projects on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property and the extent of urban transformation which could undermine the integrity and authenticity of Shakhrisyabz and requests the State Party to ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.70, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Welcomes the efforts undertaken by the State Party to respond to the recommendations of the Committee and those of the ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission (2012), and encourages the State Party to proceed with the timely adoption and implementation of the new draft Law on Cultural Heritage as well as the new Regulation on the protection, conservation and management of the historic centre of Gjirokastra and its buffer zone; Notes the ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.72, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Notes that amendments have been made to the proposed new development at Residential Area Dr.Franz-Rehrl Platz (Residential Buildings City Life Rehrlplatz) and requests the State Party to submit copies of the final plans to the World Heritage Centre for review; Also notes that the recommendations of the World Heritage Committee in relation to the new development at Schwarzstrasse 45 / Ernest-Thunstr. 2 have not been implemented and ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.83, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Welcomes the efforts made by the State Party to improve the protection of all components of the property and its buffer zone and encourages it to sustain these efforts and to secure the necessary resources and regulatory regimes to ensure no demolition, inappropriate development or deterioration to the heritage buildings which could constitute a threat to the property and its buffer zone; Notes that the State Party continues to ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.85, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Welcomes the efforts made by the State Party to review the Management Plan for the property and notes that completion of the review is foreseen for mid-2015. Also notes of the State Party’s submission of the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the Eurasia Tunnel and requested Options Appraisal but regrets that the requested HIA and Options Appraisal for the Eurasia Tunnel were only undertaken at a late stage in the project ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.113 adopted at the 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Welcomes the efforts made by the State Party to improve the protection of all components of the property and its buffer zone and requests it to sustain these efforts and to secure the necessary resources and to adopt regulatory regimes thus ensuring that no inappropriate developments or deterioration of the heritage buildings which could constitute a threat to the property and its buffer zone, will take place; Also requests the ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 38 COM 7B.33, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014), Takes note of the measures taken by the State Party to implement the previous decisions of the World Heritage Committee; Acknowledges the steps taken by the State Party to develop legal measures for the protection of the property including the moratorium on construction projects in the buffer zone and urges the State Party to adopt all relevant legal documents, regulations and measures specified in its previous decisions to support the ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decisions 36 COM 7B.94, 37 COM 7B.89, and 38 COM 7B.34, adopted at its 36th (Saint-Petersburg, 2012), 37th (Phnom Penh, 2013) and 38th (Doha, 2014) sessions respectively, Notes the recommendations of the joint ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission of January 2015 and requests the State Party to implement them as a priority; Also notes that the proposal for mining at the South Crofty mine remains dormant at the moment, and also requests that the State Party continue its vigilance of the property ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decisions 37 COM 7B.90 and 38 COM 7B.36, adopted at its 37th (Phnom Penh, 2013) and 38th (Doha, 2014) sessions respectively, Takes note of the State Party’s efforts to strengthen the policy and planning framework through guidance documents, but notes nevertheless that there still appears to be an inadequate urban planning framework to manage development in the setting of the property, with the result that development that has been approved contrary to the advice of English Heritage is beginning to have ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decision 38 COM 7B.41, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014), Commends the State Party for its efforts to advance in the drawing up planning mechanisms for the city and for the great number of conservation works, including the elevators, that are being undertaken in a situation where it also had to address the emergency situation caused by the massive fire of April 2014; Requests the State Party to submit: a timeline for the implementation of the Urban Development Policy and its instruments ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.99 adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Notes that the runway of the Rio Amarillo airport will be limited to 1200 meters long, as requested by the World Heritage Committee and the recommendations of the 2011 Reactive Monitoring mission, and recognizes the efforts made by the State Party to rescue and relocate archaeological remains located in the surroundings of Rio Amarillo; Welcomes the Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) that was undertaken by the Copan ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.102, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Appreciates the efforts made by the State Party to strengthen the management and planning mechanisms for the Historic Centre of Lima and requests the State Party to finalize the approval process of the Master Plan and submit a critical review of it by the competent authority, as well as an assessment of the effectiveness of the proposed management arrangements for the property; Reiterates its concern regarding infrastructural ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add, Recalling Decision 37 COM 7B.71, adopted at its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), Takes note of the information provided by the State Party on the revised High-Rise Concept and the new Glacis Master Plan, and that copies of English translations of these planning documents will be provided to the World Heritage Centre shortly; Notes that the details provided for the proposed development of the Vienna Ice-Skating Club / InterContinental Hotel / Konzerthaus area, as requested by the Committee, do not include ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B, WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1 and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B2, Inscribes the Blue and John Crow Mountains, Jamaica, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (iii), (vi) and (x); Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis The cultural and natural heritage of the Blue and John Crow Mountains comprises 26,252 ha of tropical, montane rainforest within the larger Blue Mountain and John Crow Mountain ranges, located in the eastern part of Jamaica in the Caribbean. These two ranges ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes Baptism Site “Bethany Beyond the Jordan” (Al-Maghtas), Jordan, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (iii) and (vi); Takes note of the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis The Baptism Site “Bethany beyond the Jordan” (Al-Maghtas) is located in the Jordan Valley, north of the Dead Sea. The site contains two distinct archaeological areas, Tell el-Kharrar, also known as Jabal Mar Elias, and the area of the Churches of ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes Rock Art in the Hail Region of Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (i) and (iii); Takes note of the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value:  Brief Synthesis The serial property of the ‘Rock Art in the Hail Region’ is comprised of two components: the Jabal Umm Sinman at Jubbah, located approximately 90 km northwest of the city of Hail, and the Jabal al-Manjor/Raat at Shuwaymis, approximately 250 km south of ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes the Climats, terroirs of Burgundy, France, on the World Heritage List as a cultural landscape on the basis of criteria (iii) and (v): Takes note of the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief Synthesis The Burgundy Climats are small and precisely delimited vineyard parcels located on the slopes of the Cotes de Nuits and of Beaune, extending for 50Km south of Dijon up to Maranges. The property encompasses the elements that made possible the ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes the Champagne Hillsides, Houses and Cellars, France, on the World Heritage List as a cultural landscape on the basis of criteria (iii), (iv) and (vi); Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis In north-east France, on cool, chalky land, the Champagne Hillsides, Houses and Cellars form a very specific agro-industrial landscape, with the vineyards as the supply basin and villages and urban districts concentrating the production and trading ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes Speicherstadt and Kontorhaus District with Chilehaus, Germany, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criterion (iv); Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis Speicherstadt and the adjacent Kontorhaus district are two densely built central urban areas in the German port city of Hamburg. Speicherstadt, originally developed on a 1.1-km-long group of narrow islands in the Elbe River between 1885 and 1927 (and partly rebuilt from 1949 ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes Diyarbakır Fortress and Hevsel Gardens Cultural Landscape, Turkey, on the World Heritage List as a cultural landscape on the basis of criterion (iv); Takes note of the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis The Diyarbakır Fortress and Hevsel Gardens Cultural Landscape is located on an escarpment in the Upper Tigris River Basin. The fortified city with its associated landscape has been an important centre and regional capital during ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Approves the extension of the Route of Santiago de Compostela to include the Routes of Santiago in Northern Spain, which becomes Routes of Santiago de Compostela: Camino Francés and Routes of Northern Spain, Spain, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (ii), (iv) and (vi); Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis The Route of Santiago de Compostela is an extensive interconnected network of pilgrimage routes in Spain whose ultimate ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes Ephesus, Turkey on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (iii), (iv) and (vi); Takes note of the following provisional Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis Located within what was once the estuary of the river Kaystros, a continuous and complex settlement history can be traced in Ephesus beginning from the 7th millennium BCE at Cukurici Mound till present day at Selcuk. It is distinguished due to its favorable geographical location, but ...
Sites: Ephesus
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes the Aqueduct of Padre Tembleque Hydraulic System, Mexico, with exception of the following component parts: 02 Town, Convent, Aqueduct and Water Tank of Tepeapulco and 03 Archaeological Site of Xihuingo, on the World Heritage List on the basis of criteria (i), (ii) and (iv); Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis The aqueduct of Padre Tembleque, named after the friar Francisco de Tembleque, was constructed between 1555 and 1572 and ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Documents WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Inscribes the Fray Bentos Industrial Landscape, Uruguay, on the World Heritage List as a cultural landscape on the basis of criterion (ii) and (iv); Adopts the following Statement of Outstanding Universal Value: Brief synthesis Located on land projecting into the Uruguay River west of Fray Bentos town, the industrial complex is marked by the enormous cold storage building and tall brick, boiler chimney which punctuate a range of saw-toothed roofs. Illustrating the whole process of ...
top