América Latina
y el Caribe

La región de América Latina y del Caribe posee un patrimonio natural y cultural de gran riqueza. Los 33 países de la Región han ratificado la Convención concerniente a la Protección del Patrimonio Cultural y Natural. La Región cuenta con 147 bienes inscritos en la Lista del Patrimonio Mundial como se indica a continuación:

Desde yacimientos arqueológicos de la época pre-hispánica, centros históricos excepcionalmente preservados a sobrecogedores emplazamientos naturales dotados de paisajes distinguidos por su biodiversidad, el Patrimonio Mundial de la región sirve como base para el fortalecimiento ulterior del desarrollo sostenible y del rol de las comunidades locales, vital para la gestión y protección del patrimonio. Un bien de Patrimonio Mundial protegido y gestionado correctamente contribuye de manera directa al desarrollo medioambiental, social y económico, y ayuda a construir una vida mejor para la comunidad local. Este proceso constituye un gran reto para los años que están por llegar, tanto para los Estados Parte de la Convención de 1972 como para la UNESCO.

33

Países

151

Bienes inscritos

104

Bienes culturales

8

Bienes mixtos

39

Bienes naturales

4

Transboundary properties

6

Properties in Danger

Informe Periódico

El proceso del Informe Periódico en la región de América Latina y el Caribe

© UNESCO / Reunión final en Santiago de Chile, 2012 sobre el proceso del Informe Periódico en ALC

Tercer Ciclo (2021)

El Tercer Ciclo del Informe Periódico para la región América Latina y Caribe, inició en octubre del 2021. El ejercicio involucra todos los sitios inscritos en la Lista del Patrimonio Mundial de la región, incluyendo los que fueron inscritos por el Comité del Patrimonio Mundial en su 44ª sesión Extendida de julio del 2021.

El objetivo del Informe Periódico es realzar el trabajo desarrollado por los actores involucrados en la gestión y en la preservación de los sitios del patrimonio mundial de la región, y de comprender como se está llevando a cabo la implementación de la Convención del Patrimonio Mundial a nivel nacional y local.

Guías y herramientas de capacitación (en inglés y en español) fueron concebidas para facilitar el rellenado de las dos Secciones del Cuestionario del Tercer Ciclo por parte de los Puntos Focales Nacionales y los Gestores de sitio del Patrimonio Mundial.

Segundo Ciclo (2013)

El objetivo del Segundo Ciclo fue el reforzar las capacidades de los Estados parte y apoyarlos a completar el ejercicio del Inventario Retrospectivo y actualización de las Declaraciones Retrospectivas de Valor Universal Excepcional en la Región ALC. El lanzamiento oficial del ejercicio se llevó a cabo en la 35a reunión del Comité del Patrimonio Mundial en 2011.

Primer Ciclo (2004)

El primer ciclo fue puesto en marcha de confomidad con los mecanismos de presentación de informes de Patrimonio Mundial (1998) y los Objetivos estratégicos de la Convención (2002). Este constituye el primer informe peródico del Patrimonio Mundial en la región ALC y fue evaluado por el Comité del Patrimonio Mundial en su 28a reunión (Suzhou, 2004).

Como seguimiento de la Decisión 37 COM 10A adoptada por el Comité del Patrimonio Mundial en su 37a reunión (Phnom Penh -2013) y basados en los resultados del segundo ciclo de Informes Periódicos, los Estados Partes de ALC, en estrecha colaboración con el Centro del Patrimonio Mundial, los Organismos Consultivos y los Centros de Categoría II, comenzaron a trabajar en la elaboración de los planes de acción regional y subregionales.

Plan de Acción

Planes de Acción regional y subregional

En su 38a reunión (Doha, 2014), el Comité felicitó a los Estados Partes de ALC por sus esfuerzos y adoptó el Plan de Acción para el Patrimonio Mundial de América Latina y el Caribe 2014-2024 y alentó a los Estados Partes en la elaboración de los planes subregionales (Decisión 38 COM 10B.4)

Más...

Descargar el plan de acción en español

Planes de Acción regional

Dando seguimiento a la Decisión 37 COM 10A adoptada por el Comité del Patrimonio Mundial y basada en los resultados del ejercicio del 2ndo Ciclo del Informe Periódico, los Estados Partes de la región LAC, en cercana cooperación con el Centro Patrimonio Mundial, Organismos consultivos y los Centros de Categoría 2, desarrollaron el Plan de Acción Regional (PARALC, 2014-2024) para responder a los grandes desafíos y prioridades relativos al Patrimonio Mundial de la región.

assessment

Questionnaire
on the follow-up of the PARALC
(2014-2024) concluded in 2019

PARALC 2014-2024
Plan de Acción para el Patrimonio Mundial en América Latina y el Caribe

Inglés Francés Español

Planes de Acción subregional

En su Decisión 38COM 10B.4, el Comité alentó a los Estados Partes a continuar, en estrecha cooperación con el Centro del Patrimonio Mundial, los Organismos consultivos y los Centros de Categoría 2 el trabajo con miras a desarrollar planes de acción subregional, basados en el Plan de Acción Patrimonio Mundial (PARALC 2014-2024) tomando como base los logros del previo plan y enfocándose en particular sobre las necesidades específicas de cada subregión.

PAC 2015-2019
Plan de Acción para el Patrimonio Mundial del Caribe

Inglés Francés Español

PAAS 2015-2020
Plan de Acción para el Patrimonio Mundial en América del Sur

Inglés Francés Español

PAMAC 2018-2023
Plan de Acción para el Patrimonio Mundial en México y América Central

Español Inglés

Desarrollo de Capacidades

Objetivo estratégico para la implementación de la Convención

© Category 2 Centre, Lucio Costa Centre / Rio de Janeiro, 2016

La falta de capacidad de gestión y de experiencia se ha determinado como una de las necesidades significativas para algunos países de la región, dificultándoles el garantizar una mejor protección de los sitios de Patrimonio Mundial dentro de su territorio.

Proyectos Extrapresupuestarios

Los proyectos financiados con recursos extrapresupuestarios constituyen una parte esencial del Plan de acción para el Patrimonio Mundial de la región. Estos favorecen la implementación de varias actividades de conservación y gestión que no pueden ser favorecidas únicamente con fondos del presupuesto ordinario. Gracias a estos donantes y socios, el Centro del Patrimonio Mundial y la Unidad de América Latina y el Caribe (CPM-ALC) es capaz de mejorar su quehacer en materia de conservación, gestión, asistencia técnica a través de seminarios, talleres, cursos de formación, creación de bases de datos y otros, entre otros.

Sierra Nevada Project
Diquis project
Proyecto Cuenca
Proyecto Qhapaq Ñan
Proyecto Tikal
Proyecto Tiwanaku

Socios UNESCO-ALC fuera de sede

Oficinas fuera de sede

Las actividades de conservación, protección y de desarrollo de capacidades llevadas a cabo en la región se efectúan a través de la cooperación reforzada entre los Estados Parte, el Centro de Patrimonio Mundial, los Órganos Consultivos y las oficinas de la UNESCO sobre el terreno. La red de la oficinas sobre el terreno juegan un papel esencial en la implementación de actividades específicas.

Centros de Categoría II

Los Centros de Categoría II para el Patrimonio Mundial se crearon con el fin de asistir y de dar soporte a los Estados Parte de las tres subregiones de LAC con el fin de implementar la Convención del Patrimonio Mundial de 1972. Se han creado dos centros con este propósito:el Centro Regional de Formación en Gestión de Patrimonio Cultural, Centro Lucio Costa (CLC) en Rio de Janeiro para la subregión de América del Sur, y el Instituto Regional del Patrimonio Mundial en Zacatecas (IRPMZ), en México para la subregión de América Central y el Caribe.

Socios

Muchas de las actividades en ALC son financiadas por:  

Japanese Funds-in Trust PanasonicNetherlands Funds-in Trust

Spanish Funds-in-Trust

News 36
Events 22
Periodic Reproting LAC: 2nd Cycle
26 Nov 2009 - 28 Nov 2009
Decisions (6)
Code: 45COM 10B
Title: Report on the results of the Third Cycle of the Periodic Reporting exercise in Latin America and the Caribbean
Year: 2023

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined document WHC/23/45.COM/10B,
  2. Recalling Decisions 41 COM 10A, 42 COM 10A, 43 COM 10B and 44 COM 10D adopted at its 41st (Krakow, 2017), 42nd (Manama, 2018), 43rd (Baku, 2019) and extended 44th (Fuzhou/Online, 2021) sessions respectively,
  3. Commends the efforts of States Parties in the Latin America and the Caribbean region in the completion and submission of Section I, and the very high level of completion and submission of Section II of the Periodic Reporting questionnaire;
  4. Thanks the Regional World Heritage Institute in Zacatecas (Mexico) and the Regional Heritage Management Training Centre ‘Lucio Costa’ (Brazil), and Advisory Bodies in facilitating the Periodic Reporting exercise in the region;
  5. Welcomes with satisfaction the Third Cycle Regional Report in Latin America and the Caribbean and encourages the States Parties to widely disseminate it among all relevant stakeholders in the region;
  6. Takes note of the planned publication of the Third Cycle Periodic Report in the Latin America and the Caribbean region in the World Heritage paper series, subject to the availability of funding resources, and invites States Parties to contribute financially for this purpose;
  7. Also commends the joint efforts made by the national Focal Points and World Heritage site managers, the UNESCO World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in producing an Action Plan framework in an adaptable format, in order to facilitate its appropriation and implementation by the States Parties;
  8. Endorses the Third Cycle Regional Framework Action Plan developed in cooperation with all States Parties and other heritage stakeholders in the region and notes with satisfaction that the priorities align with those set out in the Declaration unanimously adopted at the UNESCO World Conference on Cultural Policies and Sustainable Development – MONDIACULT 2022 (Mexico City, 2022) and the reflections undertaken at the international conference ‘The Next 50 - The Future of World Heritage in Challenging Times, Enhancing Resilience and Sustainability’ (Delphi, 2022);
  9. Encourages States Parties to appropriate the Third Cycle Regional Framework Action Plan into their national and sub-regional heritage strategies and policies, and requests the World Heritage Centre, in collaboration with the Advisory Bodies, the Category 2 Centres, and other partners, to support States Parties in its implementation;
  10. Also requests the UNESCO World Heritage Centre to monitor the implementation of the Framework Regional Action Plan in view of preparing a mid-cycle assessment report to be presented to World Heritage Committee after three years.

Read more about the decision
Code: 45COM 10D.2
Title: Progress report on the implementation of the Action Plans for the Second Cycle of Periodic Reporting in the other regions (Latin America and the Caribbean)
Year: 2023

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/10D,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 10C.4 adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Welcomes the progress made in the follow-up of the Second Cycle of Periodic Reporting for Latin America and the Caribbean,
  4. Thanks the Governments of Flanders (Belgium), Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, the Republic of Korea, Norway as well as the World Bank and European Union for their contributions towards supporting follow-up activities to the Second Cycle of Periodic Reporting in the region of Latin America and the Caribbean.

Read more about the decision
Code: 40COM 10B.4
Title: Follow-up to the Second Cycle of the Periodic Reporting Exercise for the Latin America and the Caribbean region
Year: 2016

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/10B,
  2. Recalling Decisions 37 COM 10A, 38 COM 10B.4 as well as 39 COM 10B.4, adopted at its 37th (Phnom Penh, 2013), 38th (Doha, 2014) and 39th (Bonn, 2015) sessions respectively,
  3. Takes note of the progress accomplished in the follow-up activities of the second cycle of the Periodic Reporting for Latin America and the Caribbean regarding the Retrospective Inventory process and encourages the States Parties of the region to continue their efforts in the implementation of its recommendations;
  4. Reminds States Parties which have not already done so to submit their Retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value by 1 February 2017 at the latest, as well as clarifications of boundaries by 1 December 2016 at the latest;
  5. Notes with appreciation the contribution of the Centre Lucio Costa for Capacity-Building on Heritage Management (C2C-LCC), category 2 centre under the auspices of UNESCO, to the development and implementation of a Capacity-Building Strategy as a follow-up to the Action Plan for World Heritage in South America 2015-2020 (PAAS 2015-2020) and encourages the Centre to continue its cooperation with the World Heritage Centre on the implementation of the Capacity Building Programme and activities related to World Heritage;
  6. Reiterates its request to Central American States Parties to work in close coordination with the World Heritage Centre to organize a meeting for the establishment of a sub-regional Action Plan with the participation of all stakeholders;
  7. Takes note of the progress made with a view to consolidate the establishment of the UNESCO category 2 centres for World Heritage in Zacatecas (Mexico) and in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) and encourages Mexico and Brazil to continue their efforts in this regard;
  8. Requests the World Heritage Centre to present a progress report on the implementation of the Action Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean that allows a comparison of implementation status with the approved Action Plan at its 41st session in 2017.

Read more about the decision
Code: 39COM 10B.4
Title: Follow-up of the second cycle of the Periodic Reporting exercise for the other regions and general reflection on Periodic Reporting
Year: 2015

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined document WHC-15/39.COM/10B,
  2. Recalling Decision 38 COM 10B.4 adopted at the 38th session (Doha, 2014);
  3. Takes note of the progress accomplished in the follow-up activities of the second cycle of the Periodic Reporting for Latin America and the Caribbean and encourages the States Parties of the region to continue their efforts in the implementation of its recommendations;
  4. Notes with appreciation the elaboration of the two sub-regional Action Plans for the Caribbean and for South America;
  5. Further notes with appreciation the support of the Government of Peru for the organization of the sub-regional meeting for the elaboration of the World Heritage Action Plan for South America (Cuzco, 5 to 7 May 2015);
  6. Encourages Central American States Parties to work in close coordination with the World Heritage Centre to organize a meeting for the establishment of a sub-regional Action Plan with the participation of all stakeholders;
  7. Encourages Mexico and Brazil to continue their efforts in view to consolidate the establishment of the UNESCO category 2 centres for World Heritage in Zacatecas (Mexico) and in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil);
  8. Reminds States Parties which have not already done so to submit their Retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value by 1 February 2016 at the latest, as well as clarifications of boundaries by 1 December 2015 at the latest;
  9. Takes note that, in conformity with Decision 38 COM 10B.4, the World Heritage Centre will provide a report on the progress made in the implementation of the regional and sub-regional Action Plans at its 40th session in 2016.

Read more about the decision
Code: 38COM 8E
Title: Adoption of Retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value
Year: 2014

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/8E,
  2. Congratulates the States Parties for the excellent work accomplished in the elaboration of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value for World Heritage properties in their territories;
  3. Adopts the retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value, as presented in the Annex of Document WHC-14/38.COM/8E, for the following World Heritage properties:
ASIA AND THE PACIFIC:
  • China: Wulingyuan Scenic and Historic Interest Area;
  • Japan: Gusuku Sites and Related Properties of the Kingdom of Ryukyu; Historic Monuments of Ancient Nara; Historic Villages of Shirakawa-go and Gokayama; The Hiroshima Peace Memorial (Genbaku Dome);
  • Sri Lanka: Sinharaja Forest;
  • Vietnam: Hoi An Ancient Town; Complex of Hué Monuments;

    EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA:

    • Albania: Butrint;
    • Armenia: Monastery of Geghard and the Upper Azat Valley;
    • Austria: Semmering Railway; Wachau Cultural Landscape;
    • Azerbaijan: Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower;
    • Belarus / Estonia / Finland / Latvia / Lithuania / Moldova / Norway / Russian Federation / Sweden / Ukraine: Struve Geodetic Arc;
    • Belgium: Major Town Houses of the Architect Victor Horta (Brussels); Neolithic Flint Mines at Spiennes (Mons); Notre-Dame Cathedral in Tournai; Plantin-Moretus House-Workshops-Museum Complex;
    • Bosnia and Herzegovina: Old Bridge Area of the Old City of Mostar;
    • Cyprus: Paphos;
    • Denmark: Ilulissat Icefjord;
    • Finland: Bronze Age Burial Site of Sammallahdenmäki; Fortress of Suomenlinna; Old Rauma; Petäjävesi Old Church; Verla Groundwood and Board Mill;
    • Georgia: Historical Monuments of Mtskheta; Upper Svaneti;
    • Germany / Poland: Muskauer Park / Park Mużakowski;
    • Germany: Abbey and Altenmünster of Lorsch; Bauhaus and its Sites in Weimar and Dessau; Castles of Augustusburg and Falkenlust at Brühl; Collegiate Church, Castle and Old Town of Quedlinburg; Garden Kingdom of Dessau-Wörlitz; Luther Memorials in Eisleben and Wittenberg; Monastic Island of Reichenau; Palaces and Parks of Potsdam and Berlin; Pilgrimage Church of Wies; St Mary's Cathedral and St Michael's Church at Hildesheim; Völklingen Ironworks; Wartburg Castle; Würzburg Residence with the Court Gardens and Residence Square; Zollverein Coal Mine Industrial Complex in Essen;
    • Holy See / Italy: Historic Centre of Rome, the Properties of the Holy See in that City Enjoying Extraterritorial Rights and San Paolo Fuori le Mura;
    • Holy See: Vatican City;
    • Iceland: Þingvellir National Park;
    • Italy: Botanical Garden (Orto Botanico), Padua; Ferrara, City of the Renaissance, and its Po Delta; Historic Centre of Florence; Historic Centre of Naples;
    • Lithuania / Russian Federation: Curonian Spit;
    • Lithuania: Kernavė Archaeological Site (Cultural Reserve of Kernavė);
    • Malta: City of Valletta; Hal Saflieni Hypogeum; Megalithic Temples of Malta;
    • Mongolia / Russian Federation: Uvs Nuur Basin;
    • Montenegro: Natural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor;
    • Netherlands: Historic Area of Willemstad, Inner City and Harbour, Curaçao;
    • Norway: Vegaøyan -- The Vega Archipelago; West Norwegian Fjords – Geirangerfjord and Nærøyfjord;
    • Poland: Centennial Hall in Wrocław; Historic Centre of Warsaw;
    • Portugal: Historic Centre of Évora; Landscape of the Pico Island Vineyard Culture; Monastery of Alcobaça; Monastery of the Hieronymites and Tower of Belém in Lisbon;
    • Russian Federation: Church of the Ascension, Kolomenskoye; Historical Centre of the City of Yaroslavl; Kizhi Pogost;
    • Slovakia: Bardejov Town Conservation Reserve; Vlkolínec;
    • Slovenia: Škocjan Caves;
    • Spain: Archaeological Ensemble of Mérida; Burgos Cathedral; Historic Centre of Cordoba; Monastery and Site of the Escurial, Madrid; Monuments of Oviedo and the Kingdom of the Asturias; Mudejar Architecture of Aragon; Old City of Salamanca; Old Town of Ávila with its Extra-Muros Churches; Old Town of Cáceres; Old Town of Segovia and its Aqueduct; Poblet Monastery; Route of Santiago de Compostela; Royal Monastery of Santa María de Guadalupe; San Cristóbal de La Laguna; Santiago de Compostela (Old Town); Works of Antoni Gaudí;
    • Turkey: Archaeological Site of Troy; City of Safranbolu; Hattusha: the Hittite Capital; Xanthos-Letoon;
    • Ukraine: Kiev: Saint-Sophia Cathedral and Related Monastic Buildings, Kiev-Pechersk Lavra;
    • United Kingdom: Gough and Inaccessible Islands; Henderson Island; Historic Town of St George and Related Fortifications, Bermuda;
    • United States of America: Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site; Chaco Culture; Independence Hall; Mesa Verde National Park; Monticello and the University of Virginia in Charlottesville; Statue of Liberty;

    LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARRIBBEANS:

    • Argentina: Ischigualasto / Talampaya Natural Parks; Los Glaciares; Península Valdés;
    • Belize: Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System;
    • Bolivia: City of Potosí;
    • Brazil: Brasilia; Historic Centre of Salvador de Bahia; Historic Centre of São Luís; Historic Centre of the Town of Diamantina; Historic Centre of the Town of Goiás; Historic Centre of the Town of Olinda; Historic Town of Ouro Preto; Sanctuary of Bom Jesus do Congonhas;
    • Colombia: Los Katíos National Park;
    • Costa Rica / Panama: Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park;
    • Cuba: Archaeological Landscape of the First Coffee Plantations in the South-East of Cuba; San Pedro de la Roca Castle, Santiago de Cuba; Urban Historic Centre of Cienfuegos; Viñales Valley;
    • Dominican Republic: Colonial City of Santo Domingo;
    • Guatemala: Tikal National Park;
    • Panama: Coiba National Park and its Special Zone of Marine Protection; Fortifications on the Caribbean Side, Portobelo and San Lorenzo;
    • Suriname: Central Suriname Nature Reserve; Historic Inner City of Paramaribo;

    4.  Decides that retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value for World Heritage properties in Danger will be reviewed by the Advisory Bodies in priority;
    5.  Further decides that, considering the high number of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value to be examined, the order in which they will be reviewed by the Advisory Bodies will follow the Second Cycle of Periodic Reporting, namely:

    • World Heritage properties in the Arab States;
    • World Heritage properties in Africa;
    • World Heritage properties in Asia and the Pacific;
    • World Heritage properties in Latin America and the Caribbean;
    • World Heritage properties in Europe and North America;

    6.  Takes note that the World Heritage Centre is in the process of harmonising all sub-headings in the adopted Statements of Outstanding Universal Value and, as appropriate, reflects name changes of World Heritage properties throughout the text of the Statements as requested by the Committee at its 37th session, and requests the World Heritage Centre to also update the size of the property and/or its buffer zone, as appropriate, following subsequent Decisions of the World Heritage Committee concerning Minor Boundary Modifications.
    7.  Requests the States Parties to provide support to the World Heritage Centre for translation of the adopted Statements of Outstanding Universal Value into English or French respectively, and finally requests the Centre to upload the two language versions on its website.

    Read more about the decision
    Code: 38COM 10B.4
    Title: Progress Report on Periodic Reporting in the Latin America and the Caribbean region
    Year: 2014

    The World Heritage Committee,

    1. Having examined document WHC-14/38.COM/10B,
    2. Recalling Decision 37COM 10A adopted at the 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013),
    3. Congratulates the States Parties of Latin America and the Caribbean region for their efforts to continue follow-up actions to the exercise of the second cycle of the Periodic Reporting exercise for Latin America and the Caribbean, and adopts the 2014-2024 regional Action Plan;
    4. Notes with appreciation the support of the Government of Brazil and the National Institute for Historic and Artistic Heritage (IPHAN) in organizing the regional meeting “Towards defining an Action Plan for World Heritage in Latin America and the Caribbean”, in close cooperation with the World Heritage Centre, UNESCO Office in Brasilia, the Advisory Bodies and the category 2 centres of the Region;
    5. EncouragesStates Parties and all other World Heritage partners and stakeholders in Latin America and the Caribbean to cooperate actively to ensure the implementation of the Action Plan,  which reflects regional priorities to include, but not limited to, education and public awareness, disaster risk management, integrated heritage management, and sustainable tourism in World Heritage properties;
    6. Calls upon the States Parties from the Region to support the implementation of the 2014-2024 Action Plan and also encourages them to provide technical and financial resources at national level for its implementation;
    7. Further encourages States Parties to continue working, in close cooperation with the World Heritage Centre, Advisory Bodies and the Region’s category 2 centres, to develop sub-regional action plans, based on the Action Plan and taking into consideration and building upon the achievements of the previous plan with a focus on the specific needs of each sub-region;
    8. Acknowledges the progress made by the States Parties of Mexico and Brazil in effectively establishing the UNESCO category 2 centre for the World Heritage in Zacatecas, Mexico, as well as the UNESCO Lucio Costa category 2 centre of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and strongly encourages them to continue their efforts in cooperation with the World Heritage Centre, States Parties and Advisory Bodies to initiate a capacity-building programme for the management and conservation of World Heritage in the region;
    9. Also calls upon States Parties from other regions to support the efforts of the Latin American and the Caribbean Region in implementing the Action Plan, in the spirit of the international cooperation promoted by the World Heritage Convention;
    10. Reminds States Parties which have not already done so to submit their Retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value by 1 February 2015 at the latest, as well as clarifications of boundaries by 1 December 2014 at the latest;
    11. Requests the World Heritage Centre to provide information on the progress made in the implementation of the regional Action Plan and sub-regional action plans at its 40th session in 2016.

    Read more about the decision
    top