State of Conservation
131
Reports
51
Properties concerned
37
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2007close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the civil architecture |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Deteriorated state of some of the monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Cybernetic fountain; Panaromic lifts to serve the inscribed part from other quarters of the town |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenance; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried ou |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | a) Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenanceb) Lack of maintenance for 40 years c) Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Afghanistan Austria Bahrain Belgium Brazil Chile China Colombia Cyprus Czechia Egypt France Germany Greece India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Japan Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Malta Montenegro Morocco Pakistan Peru Philippines Slovakia Spain Sweden Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Uzbekistan Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.