State of Conservation
38
Reports
38
Properties concerned
37
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2017close
Date end:2017close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
area de conservacion guanacasteArea de Conservación Guanacaste | costa rica |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: fire |
No |
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park | nepal |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
cultural landscape and archaeological remains of the bamiyan valleyCultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley | afghanistan |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Risk of collapse of the Giant Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings |
Yes |
dong phayayen-khao yai forest complexDong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex | thailand |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Forest fragmentation / Need for ecological corridors |
No |
ecosystem and relict cultural landscape of lope-okandaEcosystem and Relict Cultural Landscape of Lopé-Okanda | gabon |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
ephesusEphesus | turkiye |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore | pakistan |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
golden mountains of altaiGolden Mountains of Altai | russian federation |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi | india |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul | turkiye |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project |
No |
historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima | peru |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg | austria |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic centres of berat and gjirokastraHistoric Centres of Berat and Gjirokastra | albania |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of adequate fire fighting arrangements in the historic urban zone |
No |
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
ksar of ait-ben-haddouKsar of Ait-Ben-Haddou | morocco |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park | indonesia |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Nothofagus dieback |
No |
memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
natural and cultural heritage of the ohrid regionNatural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region | albania,north macedonia |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area | united republic of tanzania |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Challenging situation of community livelihoods; Condition and conservation of the Laetoli hominid footprints |
No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve | democratic republic of the congo |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
osun-osogbo sacred groveOsun-Osogbo Sacred Grove | nigeria |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
petraPetra | jordan |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
phong nha-ke bang national parkPhong Nha-Ke Bang National Park | viet nam |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
qal’at al-bahrain – ancient harbour and capital of dilmunQal’at al-Bahrain – Ancient Harbour and Capital of Dilmun | bahrain |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
sangha trinationalSangha Trinational | cameroon,central african republic,congo |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
silk roads: the routes network of chang'an-tianshan corridorSilk Roads: the Routes Network of Chang'an-Tianshan Corridor | china,kazakhstan,kyrgyzstan |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Comparative fragility of many sites |
No |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Declining populations of Walia ibex, Ethiopian wolf and other large mammal species |
Yes |
site of palmyraSite of Palmyra | syrian arab republic |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks |
Yes |
socotra archipelagoSocotra Archipelago | yemen |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
the great wallThe Great Wall | china |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
tombs of buganda kings at kasubiTombs of Buganda Kings at Kasubi | uganda |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Fire |
Yes |
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra | indonesia |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
tyreTyre | lebanon |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance |
No |
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley | germany |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape | lao people's democratic republic |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
western caucasusWestern Caucasus | russian federation |
2017 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.