Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

23
Reports
14
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2010close
Threats* : High impact research / monitoring activitiesclose
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: Uncontrolled growth of plants and trees
States Parties: Luxembourg
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
States Parties: Luxembourg
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
States Parties: Dominican Republic
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: Critical conditions of particularly two archaeological sites
States Parties: Ukraine
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
States Parties: Ukraine
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments;
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7A.Add.2
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: a) Natural risk factors b) Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add.2,WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add.3
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: Natural risk factorsDeterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add.Rev
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monument
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: a) Natural risk factors; b) Conservation of archaeological heritage; c) Deterioration of monuments; d) Alteration of the built fabric.
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Turkmenistan
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities
States Parties: Chile
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: High impact research / monitoring activities

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top