Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

21
Reports
21
Properties concerned
18
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2006close
Date end:2006close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
borobudur temple compoundsBorobudur Temple Compounds indonesia Indonesia 2006 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors around the property
 No
city of vicenza and the palladian villas of the venetoCity of Vicenza and the Palladian Villas of the Veneto italy Italy 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
dresden elbe valleyDresden Elbe Valley germany Germany 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
golden mountains of altaiGolden Mountains of Altai russian federation Russian Federation 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
great smoky mountains national parkGreat Smoky Mountains National Park united states of america United States of America 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2006 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye)
 No
historic monuments of ancient naraHistoric Monuments of Ancient Nara japan Japan 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
humberstone and santa laura saltpeter worksHumberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works chile Chile 2006 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenanceb) Lack of maintenance for 40 years c) Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out
 Yes
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
mount athosMount Athos greece Greece 2006 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Fire
 No
natural and culturo-historical region of kotorNatural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor montenegro Montenegro 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2006 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Serious deterioration in the state of conservation with regard to its large mammal fauna
 No
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 2006 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Declining populations of the Walia ibex, Simien fox and other large mammal species
 Yes
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra indonesia Indonesia 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tyreTyre lebanon Lebanon 2006 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
 No
um er-rasas (kastrom mefa'a)Um er-Rasas (Kastrom Mefa'a) jordan Jordan 2006 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of security and risk of collapse due to open trenches and unstable structures
 No
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka russian federation Russian Federation 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top