State of Conservation (SOC)
Natural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor (2006)
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
Total amount provided to the property: USD 46,000 (and Participation Programme 2002-04, USD 47,000).
International Assistance granted to the property
Total Amount Ap proved:70,000USD
|1982||Equipment for the Institute for the Protection of Cultural ...||50,000 USD|
|1979||Emergency assistance for the natural and culturo-historical ...||20,000 USD|
UNESCO/ICOMOS mission 2003
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
a) Earthquake damage;
b) Lack of management planning;
c) Urban development and urban pressure.
Current conservation issues
The State Party submitted a progress report at the end of January 2006, which addresses both progress in the preparation of the management plan for the World Heritage property, and the impact of the proposed bridge at the Verige Strait at the entrance of the Bay of Kotor.
The State Party noted delays in preparing the management plan launched three years ago. In essence because of changes in personnel involved in preparing the plan, efforts to prepare it have slowed down considerably. In general, it seems that earlier efforts have been abandoned and the process of preparing the plan restarted recently. The State Party designated the Regional Institute for the Protection of the Cultural Heritage of Kotor as the agency responsible for the preparation of the management plan in October 2005, with the expectation that work be launched by 31 January 2006 and be completed by 1 July 2006. The State Party report referred to a workshop carried out by ICCROM/UNESCO-BRESCE in January 2006 intended to define the process to be followed in preparing the management plan. The aim of the training workshop was to introduce the principles, practices, and planning methodologies that guide the preparation of a management plan, with specific reference to the Kotor World Heritage property. The workshop concluded with a plan of action for the local authority to complete the plan and a new proposed deadline for completion of 1 February 2007.
The analysis of the proposed Verige Bridge in the State Party report indicated some ambivalence about the proposed routing. The State Party report suggested that a UNESCO expert mission be organised to look closely at alternatives and potential impacts.
The World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS support the efforts of the State Party to complete the site management plan at the earliest opportunity, but are concerned about the long delays in launching this process, in particular as the cause of these delays has not been fully explained. The World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS were pleased to see the involvement of ICCROM in the January workshop to assist, redefine and redirect the management planning process. Following considerable concern about the decision to build the Verige Bridge, and its proposed location, the World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS suggest that a mission be sent to the property to examine the suitability of the proposed bridge at Verige and to further advise on the management planning process.
Link to the decision
Not examined by the Committee.
Draft Decision: 30 COM 7B.90
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-06/30.COM/7B,
2. Recalling Decision 29 COM 7B.84, adopted at its 29th session (Durban, 2005),
3. Noting with concern the long delays in launching the process of the preparation of the site management plan despite the efforts by the State Party,
4. Noting with appreciation the results of the January 2006 workshop to assist, redefine and redirect the management planning process and the collaboration between the State Party, ICOMOS, ICCROM, the World Heritage Centre and the UNESCO Venice Office,
5. Requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS mission with natural heritage expertise to the property to examine the suitability of the proposed bridge at Verige and its impacts on the cultural and landscape values of the property;
6. Encourages the State Party to call on the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies for any expertise which may be required to complete the management plan;
7. Strongly encourages the State Party to complete the management plan at the earliest opportunity and requests it to provide the World Heritage Centre with a progress report on its elaboration as well as a timetable for its implementation by 1 February 2007 for examination by the Committee at its 31st session in 2007.
View inscribed site documents, nomination file, reports, decisions, ...
Inscription on the Danger ListYear: 1979 -2003
Threats to the Site:
Partial destruction due to an earthquake in 1979 (the property was inscirbed on both Lists at the same time).
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).