Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2011close
Date end:2011close
Threats* : Erosion and siltation/ depositionclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
curonian spitCuronian Spit lithuania,russian federation Lithuania
Russian Federation		 2011 Erosion and siltation/ deposition, No
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo panama Panama 2011 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: a) Deterioration and destruction of the fabric of the property by environmental factors
 No
historical monuments at makli, thattaHistorical Monuments at Makli, Thatta pakistan Pakistan 2011 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: b) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb;
 No
historical monuments of mtskhetaHistorical Monuments of Mtskheta georgia Georgia 2011 Erosion and siltation/ deposition, Yes
island of goreeIsland of Gorée senegal Senegal 2011 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: risk of collapse of historic building
 No
kasbah of algiersKasbah of Algiers algeria Algeria 2011 Erosion and siltation/ deposition, No
ksar of ait-ben-haddouKsar of Ait-Ben-Haddou morocco Morocco 2011 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: Partial abandonment of the property
 No
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2011 Erosion and siltation/ deposition,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
 Yes
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2011 Erosion and siltation/ deposition, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top