Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Historical Monuments at Makli, Thatta

Pakistan
Factors affecting the property in 2011*
  • Erosion and siltation/ deposition
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other Threats:

    b) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb;

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

a) Significant decay of the property caused by local climatic conditions and alluvial erosion;

b) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb;

c) Lack of definition of boundaries of the property and buffer zone of the necropolis;

d) Lack of monitoring.

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2011
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2011**

November-December 2006: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS mission

October 2010: World Heritage Centre fact-finding mission to the property following the major flood that devastated the area in August 2010.

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2011

The State Party submitted a state of conservation report to the World Heritage Centre on 31 January 2011.  A number of management issues identified in 33COM 7B.80 have either been addressed in the State Party’s report or remain unresolved, and are outlined as follows:

a) Master Plan and Management Plan

A Master Plan for the preservation and development of the property has been developed and is yet to be approved by the Sindh Government, therefore not yet implemented, a situation that has not changed since the 2009 State Party report. As a result, there is no progress concerning the Management Plan, which is to be developed within the scope of the Master Plan.

b) Monitoring programme, Condition report and Prioritised Emergency Intervention Plan

The State Party has not reported on any of these issues.

c) Identification of boundaries and buffer zone

The State Party has indicated that work on the topographic mapping and documentation of monuments would take place after the Master Plan is approved. The State Party has stated that work on defining the property boundary and the establishment of a buffer zone will be completed before the end of June 2011.

d) Conservation of Jam Nizamuddin’s Tomb

The State Party has resubmitted a request for conservation and management under the World Heritage Fund (28 March 2011) for soil investigations to determine the stability of the foundation (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb, and prepare an action plan for measures to stabilize the endangered monuments. In addition, a condition report for all other monuments and tombs shall be carried out to establish a hierarchic emergency intervention plan.

The World Heritage Centre together with international experts carried out a fact-finding mission to the property following the major flood that devastated the area in 2010. 

The mission observed that during the flood internally displaced persons (IDP) have occupied the property. While recognising that this was not a phenomenon that can be controlled and cannot be directly attributed to the current state of conservation, the mission observed looting, vandalism, destruction and degradation of various elements of the property. The mission however, attributes some of these to the lack of clearly defined boundaries of the property and buffer zone and protective measures such as proper fencing in place. It was also observed that there were no adequate security measures in place to control the access to the property and inside some of the important buildings. The mission also felt that security measures were also necessary to protect visitors since some of the buildings within the property were in danger of collapse. On the other hand, the mission also reiterated the need to consider negative impacts of the visitors, already highlighted by the 2006 mission. The mission also noted that there was no adequate preparation of emergency plans for appropriate interventions and actions.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2011

The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are very concerned about the serious degradation of the property and the lack of adequate attention given to the issues raised by the Committee at its previous decisions. They are also concerned about the situation after the flood and the lack of any preparation for emergency situations.

The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are of the opinion that the formal adoption of the Master Plan by the Sindh Government, and the subsequent development of the Management Plan are critical to sustain the Outstanding Universal Value of the property.

The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies consider that the State Party should pursue its effort to define the property boundary and establish a buffer zone, and to resubmit its International Assistance request for the stabilisation of the Tomb of Jam Nizamuddin.

The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies suggest that, based on the findings of the October 2010 Post-flood Assessment Mission, a reactive monitoring mission be carried out to the property to enable the World Heritage Committee to re-examine the state of conservation of this property, with a view to considering, in the event of ascertained threats to the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, the possibility of inscribing the World Heritage property of the Historical Monuments at Makli, Thatta, Pakistan, on the List of the World Heritage in Danger. 

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2011
35 COM 7B.76
Historical Monuments at Makli, Thatta (Pakistan) (C 143)

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B,

2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.80, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009),

3. Expresses its condolences to the State Party for the loss and devastation caused by the floods in 2010;

4. Regrets that little progress has been made towards the implementation of the World Heritage Committee decisions and that no information has been provided concerning ongoing conservation works including repair works to pavilions, monuments and tombs;

5. Expresses its concern about the serious degradation of the property aggravated by the recent flood and the lack of preparation for emergency actions, including the lack of security measures to protect the property and urges the State Party to develop an emergency action plan to address urgent measures necessary for security and stabilisation of structures and to implement them;

6. Also urges the State Party to take action to adopt the Master Plan and to develop the management plan;

7. Further urges the State Party to take appropriate measures to stabilise the Tomb of Jam Nizamuddin;

8. Requests the State Party to submit the defined boundaries to the World Heritage Centre and proposals for the establishment of a buffer zone, for approval by the World Heritage Committee;

9. Also requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to the property to review the state of conservation and the progress on the above issues, and to help the State Party to prepare the post-flood emergency and conservation action plan;

10. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2012, a detailed report on the state of conservation of the property, including progress on the above issues and the recommendations of the 2006 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 36th session in 2012, with a view to considering, in the case of confirmation of the ascertained or potential danger to the Outstanding Universal Value, the possible inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

Draft Decision: 35 COM 7B.76

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B,

2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.80, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009),

3. Regrets that little progress has been made towards the implementation of the Committee decisions and that no information provided concerning ongoing conservation work including repair work to pavilions, monuments and tombs;

4. Expresses its concern about the serious degradation of the property aggravated by the recent flood and the lack of preparations for emergency actions, including the lack of security measures to protect the buildings and the visitors and urges the State Party to develop an emergency action plan to address urgent measures necessary for security and stabilisation of structures and to implement them;

5. Also urges the State Party to take action to adopt the Master Plan and the development of the management plan;

6. Further urges the State Party to take appropriate measures to stabilise the Tomb of Jam Nizamuddin;

7. Requests the State party to submit the defined boundaries to the World Heritage Centre and proposals for the establishment of a buffer zone, for approval by the Committee;

8. Also requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to the property to review the state of conservation and the progress on the above issues;

9. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre by 1 February 2012, a detailed report on the state of conservation of property, including progress on the above issues and the recommendations of the 2006 Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 36th session in 2012, with a view to considering, in the case of confirmation of the ascertained threat to Outstanding Universal Value, the possible inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

Report year: 2011
Pakistan
Date of Inscription: 1981
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iii)
Documents examined by the Committee
arrow_circle_right 35COM (2011)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top