Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

19
Reports
8
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2012close
Threats* : Commercial developmentclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Auschwitz Birkenau
German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945) (1997)
States Parties: Poland
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B
Threats*: Commercial development
Auschwitz Birkenau
German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945) (1996)
States Parties: Poland
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Commercial development
Auschwitz Birkenau
German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945) (1993)
States Parties: Poland
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Commercial development
Other Threats: Threat to the integrity of the property (not specified - supermarket project?)
Belfries of Belgium and France (2008)
States Parties: Belgium France
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Belfries of Belgium and France (2007)
States Parties: Belgium France
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
City of Valletta (2009)
States Parties: Malta
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape (2012)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Commercial development
Giant's Causeway and Causeway Coast (2003)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Giant's Causeway and Causeway Coast (2002)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Commercial development
Giant's Causeway and Causeway Coast (2001)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Commercial development
Hanseatic City of Lübeck (2003)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Hanseatic City of Lübeck (2002)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Commercial development
Hanseatic City of Lübeck (2001)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Commercial development
Historical Centre of the City of Yaroslavl (2008)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City (2012)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Commercial development
Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City (2011)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Commercial development
Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City (2009)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City (2008)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City (2006)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Belgium France Germany Malta Poland Russian Federation United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Threats
Commercial development 19

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top