Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

22
Reports
5
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2008close
Threats* : Air pollutionclose
Białowieża Forest (2004)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Fencing along the international border
Great Smoky Mountains National Park (2006)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Great Smoky Mountains National Park (2002)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Air pollution
Great Smoky Mountains National Park (2001)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Air pollution
Ichkeul National Park (2003)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water
Danger List:  Yes
Ichkeul National Park (2002)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water
Danger List:  Yes
Ichkeul National Park (2001)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water
Danger List:  Yes
Ichkeul National Park (2000)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9,WHC-99/CONF.204/INF.11
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water
Danger List:  Yes
Ichkeul National Park (1999)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/4,WHC-99/CONF.209/13,WHC-99/CONF.209/INF.9,WHC.99/CONF.209/INF.9
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water
Danger List:  Yes
Ichkeul National Park (1998)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7
Threats*: Air pollution
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water
Danger List:  Yes
Ichkeul National Park (1997)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A
Threats*: Air pollution
Danger List:  Yes
Ichkeul National Park (1996)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Air pollution
Ichkeul National Park (1989)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Air pollution
Ichkeul National Park (1987)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1
Threats*: Air pollution
Ichkeul National Park (1986)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Air pollution
Ichkeul National Park (1985)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1985
Document Source: SC-85/CONF.008/9
Threats*: Air pollution
Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls (2008)
States Parties: Zambia Zimbabwe
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls (2007)
States Parties: Zambia Zimbabwe
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls (2006)
States Parties: Zambia Zimbabwe
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Yellowstone National Park (2008)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Belarus Poland Tunisia United States of America Zambia Zimbabwe
Threats
Air pollution 22

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top