Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Srebarna Nature Reserve

Bulgaria
Factors affecting the property in 2001*
  • Financial resources
  • Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Water (extraction)
  • Water infrastructure
  • Other Threats:

    Loss of biodiversity

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Upstream Iron Gates dam
  • Deterioration of the water quality (issue resolved)
  • Impact of upstream pig farms (issue resolved)
  • Loss of biodiversity
  • Cyanide spill in the Danube River (issue resolved)
  • Need to finalize the Management Plan
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2001
Requests approved: 3 (from 1994-1999)
Total amount approved : 41,000 USD
Missions to the property until 2001**

1992: 2 IUCN missions; October  1998: World Heritage centre / IUCN / Ramsar mission; October 2001: joint World Heritage Centre / IUCN / Ramsar mission

Information presented to the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee in 2001

Previous deliberations
Twenty-fourth session of the Committee – paragraph VIII.4
Twenty-fourth ordinary session of the Bureau - paragraph IV.3 

New information:   The Centre has not yet received a response from the State Party to the recommendations of the twenty-fourth session of the Committee held in  Cairns, Australia (November - December 2000). IUCN has informed the Centre that in 2000, the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences prepared, with financial support from the Ramsar Small Grants Fund for Wetlands Conservation and Wise Use, a management plan for Srebarna. The plan is well prepared. The Ramsar Bureau however, has recommended the establishment of an indicator system with several simple, specific and easily measurable parameters to systematically monitor and rapidly detect changes in the state of conservation of Srebarna. In addition, the Ramsar Bureau has recommended that the Bulgarian authorities:

  • seek alternatives to the mechanical removal of bottom sediments from the Lake in order to reduce eutrophication; alternatives to mechanical removal, some of which are identified in the plan, may have less ecosystem impacts;
  • monitor water quality in the Danube River and the Srebarna Lake in a comparable manner so as to regulate water transfers between the two ecosystems; the objective of the management of the transfers between the River and the Lake should be to minimize eutrophication and to improve and restore natural ecological relationships between the two inter-connected ecosystems; and
  • use the practice of reed cutting as a management tool in selected areas and regulate it so as to improve habitat diversity and generate income for the local community.

IUCN has noted that the plan foresees the preparation of a project to establish a bilateral Ramsar site with Romania. IUCN has urged that the Centre/Ramsar/IUCN mission, recommended by the Committee at its last session, is fielded as early as possible in 2001. The mission should review plans and processes for transboundary co-operation and clarify other management issues including: long-term water management regimes, links and water-flows between the Danube and Srebarna; specific management needs in the short-to-medium term, including technical and financial support from external sources; and indicators for systematic monitoring of the state of conservation of the site.

Action Required

The Bureau commends the State Party and the Ramsar Secretariat for the preparation of the management plan and invites the State Party to consider the recommendations of Ramsar for further refining the plan as highlighted in the report above. The Bureau urges the Centre and IUCN to consult with the State Party and determine an early date for a Centre/Ramsar/IUCN mission to the site in 2001. That mission, apart from addressing issues highlighted by IUCN should also study, in accordance with the wish of the last session of the Committee, the following: the sustainability of the rehabilitation efforts undertaken; and whether the twenty-fifth session of the Committee should consider removing Srebarna from the List of World Heritage in Danger.

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2001

Principal issues:

Lake rehabilitation and assessment of its rehabilitation success; management plan finalization and adoption; and transborder co-operation with other States Parties sharing the Danube River.

 

New information:                

In accordance with the recommendation of the last session of the Committee, reiterated by the twenty-fifth session of the Bureau in June 2001, the State Party invited a Centre/IUCN/Ramsar mission to the site. The mission to the site was fielded from 1 to 4 October 2001. A detailed report on the mission’s findings is under preparation and will be included as document WHC-01/CONF.208/INF.5 for review by the Committee. The Centre representative in the mission team however, provided an oral summary highlighting salient findings of the mission.  IUCN will provide its review of the report to the Committee.

 

The mission team considers the rehabilitation of the site successful. Improvements observed by a 1998-mission have all been sustained and the chances that these improvements will continue to be sustained in the future are quite favourable. Key parameters indicative of the site’s recovery, such as the population of the dalmatian pelicans, control of water flow in and out of the lake, water quality indicators and institutional aspects such as continuity in data collection and maintenance for systematic monitoring of the state of conservation of the site, show positive or stable trends. The mission team was impressed by the dedication of the site-staff to preserve the site’s World Heritage values, despite cash-flow and financial constraints. The State Party may wish to submit a request for international assistance from the World Heritage Fund for purchasing equipment and materials essential to ensure effective regulation of water flow in and out of the Lake. 

 

The mission team noted that the preparation of the management plan for the site is progressing and that the issues highlighted by the twenty-fifth session of the Bureau in June 2001 are being addressed. The management plan, being prepared with a small grant provided by the Ramsar Secretariat Bureau, is expected to be finalized, and adopted by the appropriate authorities in the Government in due course. Discussions with other countries sharing the Danube Delta to develop an approach for transborder co-operation for World Heritage are also underway.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2001
25 BUR V.6-7
Srebarna Nature Reserve (Bulgaria)

V.6          The Bureau noted that the State Party has yet to respond to the recommendations of the twenty-fourth session of the Committee (Cairns, 2000). The Bureau learnt that the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences prepared, with financial support from the Ramsar Small Grants Fund for Wetlands Conservation and Wise Use, a management plan for Srebarna. The Ramsar Bureau has recommended the establishment of an indicator system with several simple, specific and easily measurable parameters to systematically monitor and rapidly detect changes in the state of conservation of Srebarna. In addition, the Ramsar Bureau has suggested that the Bulgarian authorities:

  • seek alternatives, some of which are identified in the plan, to the mechanical removal of bottom sediments from the Lake in order to reduce eutrophication, because they have less ecosystem impacts;
  • monitor water quality in the Danube River and the Srebarna Lake in a comparable manner so as to regulate water transfers between the two ecosystems to minimize eutrophication and improve and restore natural ecological relationships between the two inter-connected ecosystems; and
  • use the practice of reed cutting as a management tool in selected areas and regulate it to improve habitat diversity and generate income for the local community.

V.7          The Bureau commended the State Party and the Ramsar Secretariat for the preparation of the management plan and invited the State Party to consider the above-mentioned recommendations of Ramsar for further refining the plan. The Bureau urged the Centre and IUCN to consult with the State Party and determine an early date for a Centre/Ramsar/IUCN mission to the site in 2001 in order to submit a detailed report to the twenty-fifth session of the Committee in December 2001. The proposed mission should study issues such as: plans and processes for the preparation of a project to establish a bilateral Ramsar site with Romania to promote transboundary co-operation; long-term water management regimes; links and water-flows between the Danube and Srebarna; specific management needs in the short-to-medium term, including technical and financial support from external sources; and indicators for the systematic monitoring of the state of conservation of the site. In accordance with the wish of the last session of the Committee (Cairns, 2000), the Bureau also recommended that the mission review the sustainability of the rehabilitation efforts undertaken; and determine whether the twenty-fifth session of the Committee should consider removing Srebarna from the List of World Heritage in Danger.

25 COM VIII.6 - 8
Srebarna Nature Reserve (Bulgaria)

VIII.6 The Committee noted with satisfaction that in accordance with the recommendation made at its last session the State Party had invited a Centre/IUCN/Ramsar mission to the site which took place from 1 to 4 October 2001. The Committee reviewed the findings of the mission, included in document WHC-01/CONF.208/INF.5.

VIII.7 The Committee was pleased to note that improvements observed by a 1998 mission to the integrity of the site have all been sustained and that the chances of continuing improvements to the state of conservation of the site are quite high. Population of the dalmatian pelicans, control of water flow in and out of the Lake, water quality indicators and institutional aspects such as continuity in data collection and maintenance for systematic monitoring of the state of conservation of the site, were all showing positive or stable trends. The mission team had commended the staff for its dedication to preserve the site's World Heritage values despite cashflow and financial constraints. The Committee invited the State Party to consider, if necessary, to submit a request for international assistance from the World Heritage Fund for purchasing equipment and materials essential to ensure effective regulation of water flow in and out of the Lake. The Committee took note of the fact that the management plan, being prepared with a small grant from the Ramsar Convention Secretariat, will be finalized and adopted by the Government in due course and that discussions with other countries sharing the Danube Delta to develop transborder co-operation for World Heritage are underway.

VIII.8 The Committee congratulated the State Party for sustaining all the positive and stable trends in the rehabilitation of the site reported by the 1998 mission and welcomed the management's co-operation with the scientific community to ensure continuous data collection for systematic monitoring of changes in key parameters reflective of trends in the state of conservation of the site. The Committee invited the State Party to finalize the management plan and confirm its adoption by the Government and to submit a calendar of activities for preparing a proposal for a transborder World Heritage area in the Danube Delta in co-operation with other concerned States Parties to the Convention. The Committee decided to remove Srebarna from the List of World Heritage Danger, effective from the date at which the State Party submits to the Centre, IUCN and the Ramsar Convention Secretariat, a copy of the approved management plan for the site and a letter commiting core resources for the timely and effective implementation of the plan.

The Committee may wish to adopt the following decision:

 

"The Committee congratulates the State Party for its commitment to successfully rehabilitate the site and sustain all of the positive trends reported by the 1998-mission. The Committee welcomes the management’s co-operation with the scientific community to ensure continuous data collection that enables systematic monitoring of key parameters reflective of the trends in the state of conservation of the site. The Committee invites the State Party to finalize the management plan soon and confirm its adoption by the Government and to submit a calendar of activities for preparing a proposal for a trans-border World Heritage area in the Danube Delta in co-operation with other concerned States Parties to the Convention. The Committee recommends that the site be removed from the List of World Heritage Danger, effective from the date at which the State Party submits, to the Centre, IUCN and the Ramsar Convention Secretariat, a copy of the approved management plan for the site supported by a statement from the State Party commiting the necessary resources for the timely implementation of the plan."

Report year: 2001
Bulgaria
Date of Inscription: 1983
Category: Natural
Criteria: (x)
Danger List (dates): 1992-2003
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top