State of Conservation
83
Reports
35
Properties concerned
29
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2005close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Air transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Numerous ruins in the city that in danger of collapse in the event of an earthquake |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of maintenance of historic buildings; b) Use of reinforced concrete in the centre of town |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Deliberate neglect of historic properties |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Underground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Underground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need to monitor movements which could affect the structure of the building |
States Parties
Brazil Canada Chile China Ecuador Egypt Finland Germany Greece Guatemala Holy See Honduras India Italy Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Mexico Morocco Nepal Pakistan Peru Portugal South Africa Sri Lanka Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.