State of Conservation
22
Reports
22
Properties concerned
21
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
1991close
Date end:1991close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park | nepal Nepal | 1991 | Water (extraction) , | No |
dinosaur provincial parkDinosaur Provincial Park | canada Canada | 1991 | Management systems/ management plan, Oil and gas, | No |
djoudj national bird sanctuaryDjoudj National Bird Sanctuary | senegal Senegal | 1991 |
Other Threats: Training course on wetland management |
No |
durmitor national parkDurmitor National Park | montenegro Montenegro | 1991 | Localised utilities, Surface water pollution, | No |
garajonay national parkGarajonay National Park | spain Spain | 1991 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
garamba national parkGaramba National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1991 | Civil unrest, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park | brazil Brazil | 1991 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, | No |
iguazu national parkIguazu National Park | argentina Argentina | 1991 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, | No |
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1991 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1991 | Civil unrest, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, | No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
1991 | Financial resources, Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, Mining, | No |
olympic national parkOlympic National Park | united states of america United States of America | 1991 | Pollution of marine waters, | No |
pirin national parkPirin National Park | bulgaria Bulgaria | 1991 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
plitvice lakes national parkPlitvice Lakes National Park | croatia Croatia | 1991 | Illegal activities, War, | No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras | 1991 | Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, | No |
sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador Ecuador | 1991 | Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
selous game reserveSelous Game Reserve | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 1991 | Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Opening of a route to drive cattle |
No |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia Ethiopia | 1991 | Civil unrest, | No |
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve | bulgaria Bulgaria | 1991 | Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals,
Surface water pollution,
Water (extraction) ,
Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity |
No |
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park | costa rica,panama Costa Rica Panama |
1991 | Management systems/ management plan, Oil and gas, | No |
wet tropics of queenslandWet Tropics of Queensland | australia Australia | 1991 | Financial resources, Management systems/ management plan, Water infrastructure, | No |
wood buffalo national parkWood Buffalo National Park | canada Canada | 1991 | Forestry /wood production,
Localised utilities,
Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.