Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

629
Reports
127
Properties concerned
29
States Parties with SOC reports
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Asia and the Pacificclose
States Parties: China
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: China
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Bangladesh
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2024
Document Source: WHC/24/46.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B,WHC/19/43.COM/INF.7.Rev.4
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: b) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb;
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Significant decay of the property caused by local climatic conditions and alluvial erosionb) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tombd) Lack of monitoring
States Parties: China
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: China
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: China
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top