Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Historical Monuments at Makli, Thatta

Pakistan
Factors affecting the property in 2024*
  • Deliberate destruction of heritage
  • Earthquake
  • Erosion and siltation/ deposition
  • Flooding
  • Housing
  • Illegal activities
  • Land conversion
  • Management activities
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other climate change impacts
  • Solid waste
  • Other Threats:

    Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Deliberate destruction of heritage
  • Earthquake
  • Erosion and siltation/ deposition
  • Housing
  • Illegal activities
  • Land conversion
  • Management activities
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other climate change impacts
  • Solid waste
  • Flooding
  • Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin II tomb
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2024

Total amount granted: USD 30,000 from the UNESCO Regular Programme Funds for a condition survey of Jam Nizzamuddin tomb (2011); USD 33,000 from the UNESCO/Netherlands Funds-in-Trust for the Emergency assessment and immediate response to damages caused by the floods (2012); UNESCO Emergency assistance and immediate response to damages caused by the floods (2012); two phases of the UNESCO/Republic of Korea Funds-in-Trust project ‘World Heritage, Sustainable Development and Community Involvement’ for World Heritage properties in Bangladesh and Pakistan also concern this property (Phase I: 2015-2017 – USD 600,065; Phase II: 2019-2022 – USD 769,741); USD 50,000 from the UNESCO/Netherlands Funds-in-Trust for ‘Emergency Conservation of “Historical Monuments at Makli, Thatta” World Heritage Site’ (2023-2024)

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2024
Requests approved: 1 (from 2014-2022)
Total amount approved : 75,000 USD
Missions to the property until 2024**

November-December 2006: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; October 2010: World Heritage Centre fact-finding mission to the property following major floods that devastated the area in August 2010; May 2012: joint UNESCO/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; April 2016: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; April 2016: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; January 2019: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; November 2022 and February-March 2023: two UNESCO post-flood emergency missions through World Heritage Emergency International Assistance

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2024

On 22 January 2024, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/143/documents. Progress in addressing the conservation issues raised by the Committee at its previous sessions and the response to the 2022 heavy monsoon damage are presented in this report, as follows:

  • Actions taken to implement the recommendations of the UNESCO emergency missions of 2022 and 2023, including a damage assessment report for immediate stabilisation works, comprehensive site survey, drainage study, preparation of a visitor management framework, installation of a drainage canal, training activities led by a UNESCO international expert on climate change effects, work on emergency preparedness, and strengthening of documentation efforts for detached pieces and monuments;
  • Visitor services were provided for 21 active shrines, thereby supporting ongoing living traditions;
  • A comprehensive analytical report (annexed to the State Party report) on the effects of the 2022 monsoon, arising from the two emergency missions, provides an overall assessment of the site’s state, the state of the monuments and areas requiring close monitoring, required equipment and a budget estimate, and recommendations on immediate and medium conservation priorities;
  • Management tools have been elaborated, including a revised and updated Management Plan, Conservation Plan, and Disaster Risk Response Plan;
  • Inspections occur before the monsoon season, and an emergency response team has been designated to undertake urgent maintenance and interventions;
  • Mitigation/preparative measures have been identified to address potential natural disasters and climate change impacts;
  • Training and capacity building have been organised under the guidance of international experts;
  • The installation of the new main gate is complete;
  • The intervention on the floor of Mausoleum of Isa Khan Tarkhan II responded to flooding and water ingress issues, replacing flooring from the 1970s that was not part of the original historic fabric;
  • An action plan is being prepared for the stabilisation and conservation of the mausoleum of Jam Nizamuddin II;
  • Progress is being made with the proposed Minor Boundary Modification and will be submitted in due course.

Funding of USD 50,000 was approved through UNESCO/Netherlands Funds-in-Trust to provide emergency support to the Sheikh Jiyo Tomb and an unknown tomb from the Samma Period (16th-century CE).

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2024

The State Party’s continued efforts following the August 2022 monsoon and in response to the UNESCO emergency missions of November 2022 and February 2023, including preparing a comprehensive analytical report, in developing short-, medium- and long-term action plans, including financial and technical requirements, are commendable. The Committee may wish to encourage the State Party to undertake the recommended interventions. The Committee may also wish to reiterate the need for ongoing implementation of its previous decisions and all the recommendations of the 2019 Reactive Monitoring mission.

The draft Conservation Plan is useful as a targeted response to the 2022 monsoon and to address climate change vulnerability and could include a schedule of specific actions and budgets. The draft Disaster Risk Response Plan is timely and valuable but needs to address a wider range of risks, include a detailed roadmap with priorities, and identify the required resources. The updated Management Plan effectively compiles previous documents and recommendations and integrated revisions on an earlier version. As the over-arching policy document, it should integrate the key elements of the Conservation and the Disaster Risk Response Plans with a clear outline of required actions. It is recommended that all three documents be revised in accordance with the guidance already provided through the ICOMOS Technical Reviews.

The living nature of the property is an important attribute that the State Party also acknowledges. The community’s access needs to be sustained while necessary security and safety measures are deployed and conservation activities occur.

The training programme in disaster response is a timely reaction to recent challenges, and the State Party should be encouraged to continue strengthening staff capacities in all conservation areas, including stone conservation and moveable heritage management.

While the completed construction of the main gate and the reasoning behind the new masonry floor of the Mausoleum of Isa Khan Tarkhan II are noted, the State Party is advised to follow paragraphs 118bis and 172 of the Operational Guidelines by submitting project documentation, including a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) in line with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessment in a World Heritage Context, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before any decision is made that would be difficult to reverse and before any work commences. This process should also apply to future projects that may have an impact on the OUV of the property, including the forthcoming action plan for the stabilisation and conservation of the mausoleum of Jam Nizamuddin II.

The State Party's commitment to proceeding with a proposal for a Minor Boundary Modification in accordance with paragraphs 163-164 and Annex 11 of the Operational Guidelines is welcome, and the Committee may request its submission in due course.

Finally, the Committee may wish to acknowledge the recent support from the UNESCO/Netherlands Funds-in-Trust for the conservation of the Sheikh Jiyo tomb and a nearby tomb of the Samma period, identified as a short-term priority by the emergency mission. Further assistance from the international community should be encouraged to elaborate costed action plans in the Conservation Plan, Disaster Risk Response Plan and Management Plan and prepare a technical proposal for emergency and short-term interventions for prioritized monuments. Further assistance could also be encouraged to cope with the estimated loss of USD 6.1 million in the culture and heritage sector of Pakistan, as evaluated by 2022 Post Disaster Needs Assessment.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2024
46 COM 7B.39
Historical Monuments at Makli, Thatta (Pakistan) (C 143)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 45 COM 7B.170 adopted at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023),
  3. Commends the State Party’s continued actions following the August 2022 monsoon and floods’ impacts, in particular its close collaboration with the World Heritage Centre regarding the recommendations of the two UNESCO emergency missions in 2022 and 2023, and for the elaboration of the analytical report and the recommendations for conservation actions, and endorses the recommendations of the analytical report, including:
    1. Prioritizing the emergency conservation of two key monumental tombs and four platform tombs,
    2. Conducting an extensive drainage plan study and excavation with more detailed documentation,
    3. Addressing management and governance through the participation of international members to the Steering Committee,
    4. Monitoring of the work of Heritage Foundation Pakistan and that of the Endowment Fund Trust,
    5. Reinstalling polycarbonate crack monitors at the mausoleum of Jam Nizamuddin II and other locations,
    6. Procuring an orthophoto of the entire site to support a topographic drainage map and an update of the general survey,
    7. Enforcing a strict ban on smoking on-site, and improving of water supply,
    8. Allocating funds to procure necessary equipment;
  4. Requests the State Party to continue addressing its previous decisions and the recommendations of the 2019 Reactive Monitoring mission, ensuring overall site monitoring, and applying on-site preparative and mitigation measures;
  5. Welcomes the elaboration of the Conservation Plan, the Disaster Risk Review Plan and the updated Management Plan, requests that these important documents be refined and revised in accordance with the ICOMOS Technical reviews before they are finalised and implemented, and notes that the inclusion of action plans and costed schedules, including preparation of a technical proposal for emergency and short-term interventions for prioritised monuments with cost estimates, may assist with fundraising and securing further international support;
  6. Notes with satisfaction that the property continues to play an important role for the nation and the local population and requests the State Party to ensure that the property’s living nature be sustained while security and safety and conservation works are conducted;
  7. Requests the State Party to continue pursuing opportunities to strengthen staff capacities in all areas of conservation, but particularly relating to stone conservation, moveable heritage and detached architectural elements, as well as risk management and preparedness;
  8. Noting the explanation on the rationale for interventions on the Mausoleum of Isa Khan Tarkhan II and the main gate, invites the State Party to submit all necessary technical documents and impact assessments when considering projects within the inscribed zone, buffer zone and wider setting of the property that may affect its Outstanding Universal Value, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines;
  9. Requests the State Party to submit detailed project documentation for the proposed conservation works to the mausoleum of Jam Nizamuddin II, in conformity with paragraphs 118bis and 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  10. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, at its earliest opportunity, a proposal for a Minor Boundary Modification in line with Paragraphs 163-164 and Annex 11 of the Operational Guidelines and reflecting the boundaries identified in 2013, along with a regulatory plan for the proposed buffer zone, for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  11. Appreciates the financial support provided through the UNESCO/Netherlands Funds-in Trust, which enables immediate intervention to safeguard two tombs identified as short-term priorities by the emergency mission, and calls upon the international community to provide further support and technical assistance to strengthen the management framework and preserve other priority monuments within the property;
  12. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 48th session.
Draft Decision: 46 COM 7B.39

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 45 COM 7B.170, adopted at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023),
  3. Commends the State Party’s continued actions following the August 2022 monsoon and floods’ impacts, in particular its close collaboration with the World Heritage Centre regarding the recommendations of the two UNESCO emergency missions in 2022 and 2023, and for the elaboration of the analytical report and the recommendations for conservation actions, and endorses the recommendations of the analytical report, including:
    1. Prioritizing the emergency conservation of two key monumental tombs and four platform tombs,
    2. Conducting an extensive drainage plan study and excavation with more detailed documentation,
    3. Addressing management and governance through the participation of international members to the Steering Committee,
    4. Monitoring of the work of Heritage Foundation Pakistan and that of the Endowment Fund Trust,
    5. Reinstalling polycarbonate crack monitors at the mausoleum of Jam Nizamuddin II and other locations,
    6. Procuring an orthophoto of the entire site to support a topographic drainage map and an update of the general survey,
    7. Enforcing a strict ban on smoking on-site, and improving of water supply,
    8. Allocating funds to procure necessary equipment;
  4. Requests the State Party to continue addressing its previous decisions and the recommendations of the 2019 Reactive Monitoring mission, ensuring overall site monitoring, and applying on-site preparative and mitigation measures;
  5. Welcomes the elaboration of the Conservation Plan, the Disaster Risk Review Plan and the updated Management Plan, requests that these important documents be refined and revised in accordance with the ICOMOS Technical reviews before they are finalised and implemented, and notes that the inclusion of action plans and costed schedules, including preparation of a technical proposal for emergency and short-term interventions for prioritised monuments with cost estimates, may assist with fundraising and securing further international support;
  6. Notes with satisfaction that the property continues to play an important role for the nation and the local population and requests the State Party to ensure that the property’s living nature be sustained while security and safety and conservation works are conducted;
  7. Requests the State Party to continue pursuing opportunities to strengthen staff capacities in all areas of conservation, but particularly relating to stone conservation, moveable heritage and detached architectural elements, as well as risk management and preparedness;
  8. Noting the explanation on the rationale for interventions on the Mausoleum of Isa Khan Tarkhan II and the main gate, invites the State Party to submit all necessary technical documents and impact assessments when considering projects within the inscribed zone, buffer zone and wider setting of the property that may affect its Outstanding Universal Value, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines;
  9. Requests the State Party to submit detailed project documentation for the proposed conservation works to the mausoleum of Jam Nizamuddin II, in conformity with paragraphs 118bis and 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  10. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, at its earliest opportunity, a proposal for a Minor Boundary Modification in line with Paragraphs 163-164 and Annex 11 of the Operational Guidelines and reflecting the boundaries identified in 2013, along with a regulatory plan for the proposed buffer zone, for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  11. Appreciates the financial support provided through the UNESCO/Netherlands Funds-in Trust, which enables immediate intervention to safeguard two tombs identified as short-term priorities by the emergency mission, and calls upon the international community to provide further support and technical assistance to strengthen the management framework and preserve other priority monuments within the property;
  12. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 48th session.
Report year: 2024
Pakistan
Date of Inscription: 1981
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iii)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2024) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 46COM (2024)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top