Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

23
Reports
7
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Industrial areasclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2003 Industrial areas, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2002 Industrial areas, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2001 Industrial areas, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2000 Industrial areas, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1999 Industrial areas, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1998 Industrial areas, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1997 Industrial areas, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1996 Industrial areas, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1995 Industrial areas, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1994 Industrial areas, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1993 Industrial areas, No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1992 Industrial areas, No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1989 Industrial areas, No
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore pakistan Pakistan 2003 Industrial areas, Yes
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago viet nam Viet Nam 2009 Industrial areas, No
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago viet nam Viet Nam 2007 Industrial areas, No
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago viet nam Viet Nam 2006 Industrial areas, No
jesuit missions of la santisima trinidad de paraná and jesus de tavarangueJesuit Missions of La Santísima Trinidad de Paraná and Jesús de Tavarangue paraguay Paraguay 2003 Industrial areas, No
jesuit missions of the guaranis: san ignacio mini, santa ana, nuestra senora de loreto and santa maria mayor (argentina), ruins of sao miguel das missoes (brazil)Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis: San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (Argentina), Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil) argentina,brazil Argentina
Brazil		 2003 Industrial areas, No
jesuit missions of the guaranis: san ignacio mini, santa ana, nuestra senora de loreto and santa maria mayor (argentina), ruins of sao miguel das missoes (brazil)Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis: San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (Argentina), Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil) argentina,brazil Argentina
Brazil		 1999 Industrial areas,
Other Threats: Aggressive natural environment
 No
lamu old townLamu Old Town kenya Kenya 2010 Industrial areas,
Other Threats: Lack of adequate sewerage, waste disposal, and overall infrastructure, and risk to limited fresh water supplies; Fire
 No
lamu old townLamu Old Town kenya Kenya 2009 Industrial areas,
Other Threats: Fire
 No
mammoth cave national parkMammoth Cave National Park united states of america United States of America 2002 Industrial areas, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top