Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1990close
Date end:1990close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
canadian rocky mountain parksCanadian Rocky Mountain Parks canada Canada 1990 Management systems/ management plan, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1990 Management systems/ management plan, No
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1990 Management systems/ management plan, Yes
hawaii volcanoes national parkHawaii Volcanoes National Park united states of america United States of America 1990 Management systems/ management plan, No
hierapolis-pamukkaleHierapolis-Pamukkale turkiye Türkiye 1990 Management systems/ management plan, No
historic town of ouro pretoHistoric Town of Ouro Preto brazil Brazil 1990 Management systems/ management plan, No
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley nepal Nepal 1990 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
 No
mont-saint-michel and its bayMont-Saint-Michel and its Bay france France 1990 Management systems/ management plan, No
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 1990 Management systems/ management plan, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 1990 Management systems/ management plan, No
palace and park of versaillesPalace and Park of Versailles france France 1990 Management systems/ management plan, No
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park costa rica,panama Costa Rica
Panama		 1990 Management systems/ management plan, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top