Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

19
Reports
19
Properties concerned
18
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2001close
Date end:2001close
Threats* : Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and communityclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
ancient ksour of ouadane, chinguetti, tichitt and oualataAncient Ksour of Ouadane, Chinguetti, Tichitt and Oualata mauritania Mauritania 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No
ancient thebes with its necropolisAncient Thebes with its Necropolis egypt Egypt 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No
brasiliaBrasilia brazil Brazil 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Yes
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo panama Panama 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No
gunung mulu national parkGunung Mulu National Park malaysia Malaysia 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Lack of inclusion of indigenous peoples and their claims in the decision to extend the Park
No
historic town of zabidHistoric Town of Zabid yemen Yemen 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Lack of conservation measures
Yes
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes
ksar of ait-ben-haddouKsar of Ait-Ben-Haddou morocco Morocco 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: This site has progressively become degraded
No
m'zab valleyM'Zab Valley algeria Algeria 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Degradation of the overall natural environment
No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures
Yes
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park central african republic Central African Republic 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea
2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Threats to wildlife migration and populations
No
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
Yes
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top