Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

11
Reports
8
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:1994close
Threats* : Stormsclose
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Storms
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Storms
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Storms
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Storms
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
States Parties: Malta
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6
Threats*: Storms
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.)
States Parties: Portugal
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/3
Threats*: Storms
Other Threats: Poor quality of the stone and weaknesses in the resistance; Cracks; Consolidation work is not undertaken
States Parties: Portugal
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.004/3
Threats*: Storms
Other Threats: Poor quality of the stone and weaknesses in the resistance; Cracks; Consolidation work is not undertaken
States Parties: Haiti
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/3
Threats*: Storms
States Parties: Cuba
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Storms
States Parties: Benin
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Storms
Other Threats: Dilapidated state of conservation
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Benin
Year: 1985
Document Source: SC-85/CONF.008/9
Threats*: Storms

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top