Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 2001close
Date end:2001close
Threats* : Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreationclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago viet nam Viet Nam 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Rapid economic development
No
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park peru Peru 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Yes
komodo national parkKomodo National Park indonesia Indonesia 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
No
morne trois pitons national parkMorne Trois Pitons National Park dominica Dominica 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
pirin national parkPirin National Park bulgaria Bulgaria 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Threats to wildlife migration and populations
No
western caucasusWestern Caucasus russian federation Russian Federation 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2001 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top