Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

24
Reports
24
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2019close
Date end:2019close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
aapravasi ghatAapravasi Ghat mauritius Mauritius 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
baroque churches of the philippinesBaroque Churches of the Philippines philippines Philippines 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
cultural landscape and archaeological remains of the bamiyan valleyCultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley afghanistan Afghanistan 2019 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Risk of collapse of the Giant Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings
Yes
diyarbakır fortress and hevsel gardens cultural landscapeDiyarbakır Fortress and Hevsel Gardens Cultural Landscape turkiye Türkiye 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
ephesusEphesus turkiye Türkiye 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore pakistan Pakistan 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
gebel barkal and the sites of the napatan regionGebel Barkal and the Sites of the Napatan Region sudan Sudan 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi india India 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic centre of bukharaHistoric Centre of Bukhara uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2019 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: degradation of traditional houses
No
historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima peru Peru 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg austria Austria 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic centres of berat and gjirokastraHistoric Centres of Berat and Gjirokastra albania Albania 2019 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of adequate fire fighting arrangements in the historic urban zone
No
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley nepal Nepal 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
ksar of ait-ben-haddouKsar of Ait-Ben-Haddou morocco Morocco 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
natural and culturo-historical region of kotorNatural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor montenegro Montenegro 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
osun-osogbo sacred groveOsun-Osogbo Sacred Grove nigeria Nigeria 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
qal’at al-bahrain – ancient harbour and capital of dilmunQal’at al-Bahrain – Ancient Harbour and Capital of Dilmun bahrain Bahrain 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2019 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Conservation of urban fabric
No
site of palmyraSite of Palmyra syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic 2019 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
Yes
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tombs of buganda kings at kasubiTombs of Buganda Kings at Kasubi uganda Uganda 2019 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Fire
Yes
tyreTyre lebanon Lebanon 2019 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
No
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley germany Germany 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 2019 Ground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top