Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2005close
Date end:2005close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 2005 Ground transport infrastructure, No
city of vicenza and the palladian villas of the venetoCity of Vicenza and the Palladian Villas of the Veneto italy Italy 2005 Ground transport infrastructure, No
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments viet nam Viet Nam 2005 Ground transport infrastructure, No
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi india India 2005 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: rural poverty
 Yes
natural and culturo-historical region of kotorNatural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor montenegro Montenegro 2005 Ground transport infrastructure, No
rock drawings in valcamonicaRock Drawings in Valcamonica italy Italy 2005 Ground transport infrastructure, No
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2005 Ground transport infrastructure, No
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2005 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Risks of collapse
 No
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 2005 Ground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top