Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2001close
Date end:2001close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
canaima national parkCanaima National Park venezuela (bolivarian republic of) Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 2001 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Conflicts between the Pemons communities and the National Guard
No
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2001 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
 Yes
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 2001 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
 No
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo dominican republic Dominican Republic 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2001 Management systems/ management plan, Yes
los katios national parkLos Katíos National Park colombia Colombia 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 2001 Management systems/ management plan, Yes
sian ka'anSian Ka'an mexico Mexico 2001 Management systems/ management plan, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top