Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2007close
Date end:2007close
Threats* : Crop productionclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
ancient thebes with its necropolisAncient Thebes with its Necropolis egypt Egypt 2007 Crop production, No
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2007 Crop production, No
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2007 Crop production,
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenace practices
 Yes
comoe national parkComoé National Park cote d'ivoire Côte d'Ivoire 2007 Crop production, Yes
dja faunal reserveDja Faunal Reserve cameroon Cameroon 2007 Crop production, No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2007 Crop production,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
 No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 2007 Crop production,
Other Threats: Forced evacuation of Park staff; and Destruction of Park infrastructur
 Yes
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2007 Crop production, No
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 2007 Crop production, Yes
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 2007 Crop production,
Other Threats: Declining populations of Walia ibex, Simien fox and other large mammal species
 Yes
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra indonesia Indonesia 2007 Crop production, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top