Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

26
Reports
26
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2000close
Date end:2000close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
classical weimarClassical Weimar germany Germany 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments viet nam Viet Nam 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
dja faunal reserveDja Faunal Reserve cameroon Cameroon 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore pakistan Pakistan 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
golden mountains of altaiGolden Mountains of Altai russian federation Russian Federation 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
gondwana rainforests of australiaGondwana Rainforests of Australia australia Australia 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 2000 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Need for more effective catchment management in lands adjacent to the Park
No
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi india India 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago viet nam Viet Nam 2000 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Risks linked to addressing environmental impacts of individual projects to the neglect of monitoring cumulative impacts of the overall development of Ha Long City and other areas surrounding the World Heritage area
No
historic city of meknesHistoric City of Meknes morocco Morocco 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2000 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Accident of a crane which damaged one of the most important monuments at Machu Picchu, the Intihuatana or stone sundial
No
huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park peru Peru 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
mount emei scenic area, including leshan giant buddha scenic areaMount Emei Scenic Area, including Leshan Giant Buddha Scenic Area china China 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea
2000 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
petraPetra jordan Jordan 2000 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Conservation of antiquities
No
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 2000 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
Yes
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
wet tropics of queenslandWet Tropics of Queensland australia Australia 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2000 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top