Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2005close
Date end:2005close
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
bahla fortBahla Fort oman Oman 2005 Management activities,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structure of the Fort
No
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo dominican republic Dominican Republic 2005 Management activities, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2005 Management activities,
Other Threats: Implementation of quarantine measures
No
gelati monasteryGelati Monastery georgia Georgia 2005 Management activities,
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work of the monuments
No
historic cairoHistoric Cairo egypt Egypt 2005 Management activities,
Other Threats: Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance
No
historic ensemble of the potala palace, lhasaHistoric Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa china China 2005 Management activities, No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2005 Management activities,
Other Threats: a) Structural integrity and stability of the Church of the Transfiguration; b) Deformation of wooden structures.
No
lumbini, the birthplace of the lord buddhaLumbini, the Birthplace of the Lord Buddha nepal Nepal 2005 Management activities,
Other Threats: Impact of new structure of the Maya Devi Temple in the core area
No
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2005 Management activities, No
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2005 Management activities,
Other Threats: vegetation with roots seriously affecting archaeological remains
Yes
vilnius historic centreVilnius Historic Centre lithuania Lithuania 2005 Management activities, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top