Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1991close
Date end:1991close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
city of vallettaCity of Valletta malta Malta 1991 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Highly crumbly basic building material
No
dinosaur provincial parkDinosaur Provincial Park canada Canada 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1991 Management systems/ management plan, Yes
hierapolis-pamukkaleHierapolis-Pamukkale turkiye Türkiye 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No
kakadu national parkKakadu National Park australia Australia 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No
mont-saint-michel and its bayMont-Saint-Michel and its Bay france France 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No
pirin national parkPirin National Park bulgaria Bulgaria 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park costa rica,panama Costa Rica
Panama		 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No
wet tropics of queenslandWet Tropics of Queensland australia Australia 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No
xanthos-letoonXanthos-Letoon turkiye Türkiye 1991 Management systems/ management plan, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top