Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

14
Reports
8
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:1993close
Threats* : Land conversionclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 1993 Land conversion,
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
 Yes
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 1987 Land conversion,
Other Threats: Fires
 No
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley nepal Nepal 1993 Land conversion,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
 No
los glaciares national parkLos Glaciares National Park argentina Argentina 1986 Land conversion, No
los glaciares national parkLos Glaciares National Park argentina Argentina 1985 Land conversion, No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 1993 Land conversion,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures;
Yes
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 1992 Land conversion,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures
 No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 1991 Land conversion, No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 1990 Land conversion, No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 1989 Land conversion, No
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 1993 Land conversion, Yes
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 1992 Land conversion, No
sinharaja forest reserveSinharaja Forest Reserve sri lanka Sri Lanka 1993 Land conversion,
Other Threats: Need to implement the Management Plan as a priority
 No
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1993 Land conversion, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top