Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 1992close
Date end:1992close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
andrefana dry forestsAndrefana Dry Forests madagascar Madagascar 1992 Management systems/ management plan, No
dinosaur provincial parkDinosaur Provincial Park canada Canada 1992 Management systems/ management plan, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1992 Management systems/ management plan, No
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1992 Management systems/ management plan, Yes
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park central african republic Central African Republic 1992 Management systems/ management plan, No
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 1992 Management systems/ management plan, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 1992 Management systems/ management plan, No
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 1992 Management systems/ management plan, No
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park costa rica,panama Costa Rica
Panama		 1992 Management systems/ management plan, No
wet tropics of queenslandWet Tropics of Queensland australia Australia 1992 Management systems/ management plan, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top