jump to the content
Advanced search

State of Conservation (SOC)

Tsingy de Bemaraha Strict Nature Reserve (1992)

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0 (from1988-1992)
Total Amount Ap proved: 65,000USD

1992   Purchase of equipment for the management of Tsingy de Bemaraha   20,000  USD
1992   Organization of a seminar on the conservation and management of ...   20,000  USD
1988   Training workshop on the management of natural resources and ...   25,000  USD
Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues

[Oral report by IUCN and the Secretariat] 

Conclusion
Decision

  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

16COMVIII
Link to the decision

Tsingy Bemaraha Nature Reserve (Madagascar)

The Committee was concerned with the information reported by the Representative of IUCN concerning the disruption of conservation activities due to shortage of supplies in, and transport to, this site which is situated in a remote part of Madagascar. The Committee noted that the World Heritage Fund has provided to this site US$20,000 for the purchase of equipment and an additional US$20,000 for a management seminar during 1992. The Committee instructed the Centre to contact the Malagasy authorities and request a state of conservation report for this World Heritage site and a progress report on the expenditure of funds provided in 1992.

 

No draft Decision

Tsingy de Bemaraha Strict Nature Reserve
State Party:
Madagascar
Date of Inscription: 1990
Nomination records (Year): 1987, 1987
Category: Natural
Criteria: (vii)(x)
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
1992
Threats*
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Financial resources
  • Other Threats:
Documents
WHC.92/CONF.002/12
Other Documents:
View inscribed site documents, nomination file, reports, decisions, ...
SOC ID: 1699

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.