jump to the content
Advanced search

State of Conservation (SOC)

Dinosaur Provincial Park (1992)

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0
Total Amount Ap proved: 0USD

Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

Gas exploitation (issue resolved); Need for an increase of the park boundaries

Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues

The World Heritage Centre has informed the Canadian authorities that the Bureau recommended the Committee to register the report and the map provided by them as a description of the revised boundaries of the Dinosaur Provincial Park. 

Conclusion
Decision

  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

16COMVIII.12
Link to the decision

VIII.12 The Committee decided to register the report and the map provided by the Canadian authorities as a description of the revised boundaries of the Dinosaur Provincial Park (Canada). The Committee expressed satisfaction on the progress in the implementation of the rehabilitation project in the Simien National Park (Ethiopia) for which the Committee approved US$50,000 at its last session. In the case of Iguazu National Park (Argentina), Iguazu National Park (Brazil) and Wood Buffalo National Park (Canada), the Committee requested the Centre to submit progress on their state of conservaiton to the Bureau scheduled to meet in mid-1993 at UNESCO Headquarters, Paris.

 

No draft Decision

Dinosaur Provincial Park
State Party:
Canada
Date of Inscription: 1979
Nomination records (Year): 1979
Category: Natural
Criteria: (vii)(viii)
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
1992
1991
Threats*
  • Oil and gas
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other Threats:
Documents
CLT.92/CONF.003/03
WHC.92/CONF.002/05
Other Documents:
View inscribed site documents, nomination file, reports, decisions, ...
SOC ID: 1713

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.