State of Conservation
76
Reports
25
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2015close
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Decline of the seal population; b) Forest fires |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | necessity to strengthen the integrity within the property |
States Parties: | Central African Republic |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A,WHC.03/27.COM/7A.Corr |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled forest land excisions, in the Mount Hombe and Ragat blocks |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled forest land excisions, in the Mount Hombe and Ragat blocks |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Saint Lucia |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Honduras |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Honduras |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Honduras |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Honduras |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of infrastructure and services for small producers and potential tourism initiatives hinder sustainable economic development and are underlying causes for poverty, leading to over-exploitation of natural resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Australia Belize Brazil Central African Republic Côte d'Ivoire Ecuador Ethiopia Guinea Honduras Kenya Niger Oman Panama Peru Romania Russian Federation Saint Lucia Slovenia Solomon Islands United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania YemenThreats
Legal framework 76
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.