State of Conservation
216
Reports
57
Properties concerned
40
States Parties with SOC reports
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
Other Threats: | Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | India |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
Other Threats: | Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
Other Threats: | Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
Other Threats: | Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
Other Threats: | vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | decay and loss of Ottoman/vernacular architecture |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | decay and loss of Ottoman/vernacular architecture |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | decay and loss of Ottoman/vernacular architecture |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Fire in December 2002 |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties
Afghanistan Argentina Australia Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Chile China Colombia Ethiopia France Germany Ghana Guatemala India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Jordan Kenya Lebanon Malta Mauritius Mexico Morocco Nepal Oman Pakistan Paraguay Peru Poland Russian Federation South Africa Sri Lanka Tunisia Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.