Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

96
Reports
96
Properties concerned
65
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2008close
Date end:2008close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
States Parties: Panama
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration and destruction of the fabric of the property by environmental factors, lack of maintenance, as well as polluted water
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented.
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: India
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add2
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance
States Parties: Estonia
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Impact of the transportation of hazardous materials to the Old Town
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Czechia
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration of monuments in general and the fortifications in particular
States Parties: Uruguay
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add2
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Chile
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried out
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Argentina
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top