Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

9
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
Property: Iguaçu National Parkclose
Date end:2003close
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2003 Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, Management systems/ management plan, Surface water pollution, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2001 Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, Management systems/ management plan, Surface water pollution, Yes
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, Management systems/ management plan, Surface water pollution, Yes
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1999 Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, Management systems/ management plan, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1998 Ground transport infrastructure, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, Water infrastructure, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1997 Ground transport infrastructure, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1992 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1991 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 1989 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top