Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

169
Reports
40
Properties concerned
19
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2007mode%3Dmapclose
Date end:2007close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Numerous ruins in the city that in danger of collapse in the event of an earthquake
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Conflicts between the Pemons communities and the National Guard
States Parties: Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.204/INF.18,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Conflicts between the Pemons communities and the National Guard
States Parties: Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenace practices
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/13
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/8A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: destabilisation of one of the main structures
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Growth of native vegetation (Pinkuyo), the roots of which destabilize the foundations
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top