Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

23
Reports
23
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2012close
Date end:2012close
Threats* : Legal frameworkclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
ancient ksour of ouadane, chinguetti, tichitt and oualataAncient Ksour of Ouadane, Chinguetti, Tichitt and Oualata mauritania Mauritania 2012 Legal framework, No
ancient villages of northern syriaAncient Villages of Northern Syria syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic 2012 Legal framework, No
archaeological site of carthageArchaeological Site of Carthage tunisia Tunisia 2012 Legal framework, No
archaeological site of panamá viejo and historic district of panamáArchaeological Site of Panamá Viejo and Historic District of Panamá panama Panama 2012 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Severe deterioration of historic buildings that threaten the Outstanding Universal Value of the property;
No
bahla fortBahla Fort oman Oman 2012 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort
No
cerrado protected areas: chapada dos veadeiros and emas national parksCerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks brazil Brazil 2012 Legal framework, No
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore pakistan Pakistan 2012 Legal framework, Yes
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2012 Legal framework, No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 2012 Legal framework, No
lumbini, the birthplace of the lord buddhaLumbini, the Birthplace of the Lord Buddha nepal Nepal 2012 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity.
No
mahabodhi temple complex at bodh gayaMahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya india India 2012 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Loss of character of the cultural landscape directly associated with the property and its outstanding universal value
No
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan honduras Honduras 2012 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena
No
medieval monuments in kosovoMedieval Monuments in Kosovo serbia Serbia 2012 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Unsatisfactory state of conservation and maintenance of the property.
Yes
natural and culturo-historical region of kotorNatural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor montenegro Montenegro 2012 Legal framework, No
ouadi qadisha (the holy valley) and the forest of the cedars of god (horsh arz el-rab)Ouadi Qadisha (the Holy Valley) and the Forest of the Cedars of God (Horsh Arz el-Rab) lebanon Lebanon 2012 Legal framework, No
port, fortresses and group of monuments, cartagenaPort, Fortresses and Group of Monuments, Cartagena colombia Colombia 2012 Legal framework, No
provins, town of medieval fairsProvins, Town of Medieval Fairs france France 2012 Legal framework, No
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras philippines Philippines 2012 Legal framework, Yes
rock-hewn churches, lalibelaRock-Hewn Churches, Lalibela ethiopia Ethiopia 2012 Legal framework, No
royal palaces of abomeyRoyal Palaces of Abomey benin Benin 2012 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components
No
stone town of zanzibarStone Town of Zanzibar united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2012 Legal framework,
Other Threats: b) Environmental pressures in relation with the Malindi port projectc) Natural disasters and lack of risk-preparedness
No
timbuktuTimbuktu mali Mali 2012 Legal framework,
Other Threats: Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee
No
western caucasusWestern Caucasus russian federation Russian Federation 2012 Legal framework, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top