Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Tomb of Askia

Mali
Factors affecting the property in 2023*
  • Deliberate destruction of heritage
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • War
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Lack of site management
  • Armed conflict
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
  • Occupation of Gao city by armed groups
  • Inability to ensure daily management in the protection and conservation of the property
  • Risk of collapse of the property
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger

In progress

Corrective Measures for the property
Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures

In progress

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2023

Total amount granted: UNESCO Emergency Fund: USD 40,000; Action Plan for the rehabilitation of cultural heritage and the safeguarding of ancient manuscripts in Mali: USD 50,000; USD 500,000 funded by the International Alliance for the Protection of heritage in conflict areas (ALIPH) for the rehabilitation of the property; African World Heritage Fund: USD 15,000 for the documentation and development of the historical burial grounds of the Tomb of Askia necropolis in Gao.

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2023
Requests approved: 4 (from 2000-2018)
Total amount approved : 79,822 USD
Missions to the property until 2023**

May 2012: Emergency UNESCO mission to Bamako; October and December 2012: World Heritage Centre monitoring missions to Bamako; February 2014: UNESCO assessment mission to Gao; April 2017: UNESCO Expert mission to assess the state of conservation of Mali's World Heritage properties.

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2023

On 31 January 2022, the State Party submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property (available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1139/documents/), providing the following information:

  • Despite persistent insecurity, the state of conservation of the property is improving progressively. The involvement of local communities, particularly youth and women, in the management, restoration and maintenance have been decisive in the progress made;
  • The “Project for the Rehabilitation of the Tomb of Askia”, financed by the International Alliance for the Protection of Heritage in Conflict Zones (ALIPH) and operationally launched on 10 March 2020, is underway despite an administrative delay encountered;
  • Implemented by the National Directorate of Cultural Heritage, CRAterre, the Cultural Mission of Gao and the auditing firm 'Pyramis', in collaboration with local communities, the project includes the following activities (ongoing or already completed):
  • Consolidation of the physical structures of the property,
  • Training of masons and guides,
  • Development of the ablutions area,
  • Rehabilitation of the electrical installation,
  • Construction of latrines,
  • Rehabilitation of the fence,
  • Replacement of metal doors with wooden ones,
  • Planting and regeneration of hasu plants in the courtyard of the Tomb of Askia and supplying the site with hasu poles,
  • Production of booklets and a conservation manual,
  • Provision of computer equipment and materials to the Cultural Mission of Gao;
  • The reduction of the height of the enclosure wall is proposed to improve the visibility of the property;
  • In 2021, other activities included Management Committee consultations on the liberation of the buffer zone, radio broadcasts on animal roaming within the property, and guided tours for school children;
  • The project to develop parking areas in front of the main gate of the property and behind the asphalt road has been abandoned;
  • It is proposed to fence off the buffer zone with a low wall and to intensify information and awareness-raising activities around the site;
  • A project for the documentation and development of the historic graves of the Necropolis, financed by the African World Heritage Fund (AWHF), was scheduled to start in February 2022;
  • The National Blue Shield Committee has been established and presented in a brochure on African National Committees produced in partnership with the German Committee;
  • The Management and Conservation Plan for the Tomb of Askia (2018-2022) has come to an end and the need for its evaluation is mentioned;
  • The security situation is identified as the main threat to the property, despite the progress made by the State Party's defense and security forces.

The work on the development of the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR) carried out since 2022 will be finalized during 2023.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2023

The State Party report on the property suggests that the conservation and effective and sustainable management of the property is progressing well and with promise. Indeed, it appears that the ALIPH-funded rehabilitation project has been able to trigger a significant dynamic mobilization by the State Party and especially at the local community level to address several aspects dedicated to the conservation and promotion of the property. These include the structural and physical consolidation of the building, developments within the property itself as well as in the buffer zone, the planting and regeneration of hasu plants, the provision of equipment and computer material to the Cultural Mission of Gao, communication, consultation and awareness-raising efforts, and the involvement of local communities, in particular young people, and women, in the various actions. The State Party is strongly encouraged to continue along these lines, while ensuring that the implementation of the project, for which the ‘Pyramis’ auditing firm was hired to provide support following the administrative delay, is speeded up.

The State Party is also to be congratulated for having set up a National Blue Shield Committee and for having succeeded in mobilizing additional funds for the documentation and development of the historic graves of the necropolis, through funding from the African World Heritage Fund (AWHF). The previous request that the State Party ensure coordination with the different partners and donors of the projects developed for the mobilization of funds should be recalled, in order to ensure greater coherence between the actions and to provide for the establishment of a system of consultation between these partners for effective monitoring.

The abandonment of the project to develop car parks in front of the main gate of the property and behind the asphalt road, as well as the plans to improve the visibility of the property by reducing the height of its boundary wall, are welcomed, demonstrating the attention given to the property beyond the building itself. However, with regard to the proposed construction of low walls to enclose the buffer zone, it is recommended that the Committee invite the State Party to submit more details, including signage and monitoring of the urban planning standards to be applied, in order to better understand the contribution of the project to the preservation of the site.

Noting that the management and conservation plan for the property expired in 2022 and will need to be updated, the State Party should be requested to submit the draft updated management plan to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies.

Overall, all 10 corrective measures are now underway or even finalized, although financial means, outside of current funding, for conservation and sustainable management remain precarious. It should also be recalled that these corrective measures were adopted by the Committee in 2016, but without a Desired state of conservation for removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR) having been developed.

It is therefore noted with appreciation that the development of the DSOCR is being finalized. This initiative, consisting of a capacity building and remote and field assistance programme, is led by CRAterre-ENSAG (Grenoble/France) and a national consultant in partnership with the National Directorate of Cultural Heritage (DNPC) targeting all three of the Malian properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger ('Tomb of Askia', 'Timbuktu' and 'Ancient Towns of Djenné'). It is implemented within the framework of the World Heritage Centre "Strategy for developing the desired state of conservation with a view to the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger in the Africa region 2021-2025”, and is financially supported by the Government of Norway in several African countries. This process is therefore welcomed. It is hoped that the development of the DSOCR and the positive evolution noted for the implementation of the corrective measures will lead to the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger in the short term.

In the meantime, it is recommended that the Committee decide to retain the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger, and to continue to apply the reinforced monitoring mechanism for the property.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2023
45 COM 7A.24
Tomb of Askia (Mali) (C 1139)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7A,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7A.3 adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Expresses its satisfaction that the "Project for the Rehabilitation of the Tomb of Askia", financed by the International Alliance for Protection of Heritage in Conflict Areas (ALIPH), has enabled a significant dynamic mobilization by the State Party and the local community for the effective conservation, management and promotion of the property through a series of measures on the property and its buffer zone, and strongly encourages the State Party to continue in this direction, while ensuring an acceleration of the implementation of the project to overcome the administrative delays encountered;
  4. Also appreciates the establishment of a National Blue Shield Committee and for having succeeded in mobilizing additional funds for the documentation and development of the historic graves of the Necropolis from the African World Heritage Fund (AWHF), and reiterates its request to the State Party to coordinate with the different partners and donors the projects developed for the mobilization of funds, in order to ensure greater coherence between the actions and to foresee the establishment of a system of consultation between these partners for an effective follow-up;
  5. Thanks the State Party for having informed it of its decision to abandon the project to develop car parks in front of the main gate of the property and behind the asphalt road;
  6. Notes with appreciation the plans to improve the visibility of the property by reducing the height of the enclosing wall;
  7. Welcomes the efforts made also in the buffer zone, notably for a project to build low walls to fence off the buffer zone, invites however the State Party to submit more details, notably concerning signage and monitoring of urban planning standards to be applied, to the World Heritage Centre in order to better understand the contribution of the project to the preservation of the site;
  8. Notes that the management and conservation plan of the property expired in 2022 and requests the State Party to submit the updated draft management plan to the World Heritage Centre for examination by the Advisory Bodies;
  9. Notes with satisfaction that the 10 corrective measures are now all being implemented but urges the State Party to ensure the durability of the technical and financial means for the sustainable conservation and management of the property;
  10. Expresses its appreciation that a capacity building and remote and field assistance programme, supported by the World Heritage Fund, for the development of the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR) for all three Malian properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger, is currently being finalized;
  11. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session;
  12. Decides to continue the application of the Reinforced Monitoring Mechanism for the property;
  13. Decides to retain Tomb of Askia (Mali) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
45 COM 8C.2
Update of the List of World Heritage in Danger (Retained Properties)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined the state of conservation reports of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger (WHC/23/45.COM/7A, WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add, WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add.2, WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add.3, WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add.4),
  2. Having examined the recommendations of the Advisory Bodies, decides to retain the following properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger:
  • Afghanistan, Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley (Decision 45 COM 7A.51)
  • Afghanistan, Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam (Decision 45 COM 7A.52)
  • Austria, Historic Centre of Vienna (Decision 45 COM 7A.55)
  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of), City of Potosí (Decision 45 COM 7A.18)
  • Central African Republic, Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.3)
  • Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea, Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (Decision 45 COM 7A.4)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Garamba National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.5)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kahuzi-Biega National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.6)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Okapi Wildlife Reserve (Decision 45 COM 7A.7)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Virunga National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.8)
  • Egypt, Abu Mena (Decision 45 COM 7A.26)
  • Honduras, Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (Decision 45 COM 7A.1)
  • Indonesia, Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (Decision 45 COM 7A.15)
  • Iraq, Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) (Decision 45 COM 7A.27)
  • Iraq, Hatra (Decision 45 COM 7A.28)
  • Iraq, Samarra Archaeological City (Decision 45 COM 7A.29)
  • Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (site proposed by Jordan) (Decision 45 COM 7A.31)
  • Kenya, Lake Turkana National Parks (Decision 45 COM 7A.10)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Cyrene (Decision 45 COM 7A.33)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna (Decision 45 COM 7A.34)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Sabratha (Decision 45 COM 7A.35)
  • Libya, Old Town of Ghadamès (Decision 45 COM 7A.36)
  • Libya, Rock-Art Sites of Tadrart Acacus (Decision 45 COM 7A.37)
  • Madagascar, Rainforests of the Atsinanana (Decision 45 COM 7A.11)
  • Mali, Old Towns of Djenné (Decision 45 COM 7A.22)
  • Mali, Timbuktu (Decision 45 COM 7A.23)
  • Mali, Tomb of Askia (Decision 45 COM 7A.24)
  • Mexico, Islands and Protected Areas of the Gulf of California (Decision 45 COM 7A.2)
  • Micronesia (Federated States of), Nan Madol: Ceremonial Centre of Eastern Micronesia (Decision 45 COM 7A.53)
  • Niger, Aïr and Ténéré Natural Reserves (Decision 45 COM 7A.12)
  • Palestine, Palestine: Land of Olives and Vines – Cultural Landscape of Southern Jerusalem, Battir (Decision 45 COM 7A.39)
  • Palestine, Hebron/Al-Khalil Old Town (Decision 45 COM 7A.38)
  • Panama, Fortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo (Decision 45 COM 7A.19)
  • Peru, Chan Chan Archaelogical Zone (Decision 45 COM 7A.20)
  • Romania, Roșia Montană Mining Landscape (Decision 45 COM 7A.56)
  • Senegal, Niokolo-Koba National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.13)
  • Serbia, Medieval Monuments in Kosovo (Decision 45 COM 7A.57)
  • Solomon Islands, East Rennell (Decision 45 COM 7A.16)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Aleppo (Decision 45 COM 7A.40)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Bosra (Decision 45 COM 7A.41)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Damascus (Decision 45 COM 7A.42)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient Villages of Northern Syria (Decision 45 COM 7A.43)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Crac des Chevaliers and Qal’at Salah El-Din (Decision 45COM 7A.44)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Site of Palmyra (Decision 45 COM 7A.45)
  • United Republic of Tanzania, Selous Game Reserve (Decision 45 COM 7A.14)
  • United States of America, Everglades National Park (Decision 45 COM 7A.17)
  • Uzbekistan, Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz (Decision 45 COM 7A.54)
  • Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Coro and its Port (Decision 45 COM 7A.21)
  • Yemen, Historic Town of Zabid (Decision 45 COM 7A.47)
  • Yemen, Old City of Sana’a (Decision 45 COM 7A.49)
  • Yemen, Old Walled City of Shibam (Decision 45 COM 7A.50)
3.    Recalls that the following properties were inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger at its 18th extraordinary session (UNESCO, 2023):
  • Lebanon, Rachid Karami International Fair-Tripoli (Decision 18 EXT.COM 5.1)
  • Ukraine, The Historic Centre of Odesa (Decision 18 EXT.COM 5.2)
  • Yemen, Landmarks of the Ancient Kingdom of Saba, Marib (Decision 18 EXT.COM 5.3)
Draft Decision: 45 COM 7A.24

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7A,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7A.3, adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Expresses its satisfaction that the "Project for the Rehabilitation of the Tomb of Askia", financed by the International Alliance for Protection of Heritage in Conflict Areas (ALIPH), has enabled a significant dynamic mobilization by the State Party and the local community for the effective conservation, management and promotion of the property through a series of measures on the property and its buffer zone, and strongly encourages the State Party to continue in this direction, while ensuring an acceleration of the implementation of the project to overcome the administrative delays encountered;
  4. Also appreciates the establishment of a National Blue Shield Committee and for having succeeded in mobilizing additional funds for the documentation and development of the historic graves of the Necropolis from the African World Heritage Fund (AWHF), and reiterates its request to the State Party to coordinate with the different partners and donors the projects developed for the mobilization of funds, in order to ensure greater coherence between the actions and to foresee the establishment of a system of consultation between these partners for an effective follow-up;
  5. Thanks the State Party for having informed it of its decision to abandon the project to develop car parks in front of the main gate of the property and behind the asphalt road;
  6. Notes with appreciation the plans to improve the visibility of the property by reducing the height of the enclosing wall;
  7. Welcomes the efforts made also in the buffer zone, notably for a project to build low walls to fence off the buffer zone, invites however the State Party to submit more details, notably concerning signage and monitoring of urban planning standards to be applied, to the World Heritage Centre in order to better understand the contribution of the project to the preservation of the site;
  8. Notes that the management and conservation plan of the property expired in 2022 and requests the State Party to submit the updated draft management plan to the World Heritage Centre for examination by the Advisory Bodies;
  9. Notes with satisfaction that the 10 corrective measures are now all being implemented but urges the State Party to ensure the durability of the technical and financial means for the sustainable conservation and management of the property;
  10. Expresses its appreciation that a capacity building and remote and field assistance programme, supported by the World Heritage Fund, for the development of the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR) for all three Malian properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger, is currently being finalized;
  11. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session;
  12. Decides to continue the application of the Reinforced Monitoring Mechanism for the property;
  13. Decides to retain Tomb of Askia (Mali) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2023
Mali
Date of Inscription: 2004
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iii)(iv)
Danger List (dates): 2012-present
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2022) .pdf
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
arrow_circle_right 45COM (2023)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top