Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Old Walled City of Shibam

Yemen
Factors affecting the property in 2015*
  • Civil unrest
  • Flooding
  • Other Threats:

    Poor maintenance

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Floods (issue previously reported as being resolved)
  • Poor  maintenance (issue previously reported as being resolved)
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2015
Requests approved: 6 (from 1982-1999)
Total amount approved : 121,966 USD
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2015

On 20 March 2015, the State Party submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/192/documents/.

The State Party has reported that Yemen continues to suffer significant political and socio-economic disturbances which affect conservation and development and that the property is also subject to degradation from natural causes including rains and floods. There were significant floods in 2013 but only some of the damage from these floods has been addressed, with support of the Daw’an Mud Brick Architecture Foundation, during 2014.

Noting that the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) involvement at the property ceased in 2010, the State Party reports that there are no ongoing physical conservation programs, yet 20 significant buildings are currently subject to severe damage, 60 to medium damage and 22 to minor damage. The State Party further reports that the security situation is preventing further donor funding or administrative support.

The Ministry of Culture, represented by the General Organization for the Preservation of Historic Cities in Yemen (GOPHCY) in collaboration with the German Agency for International Corporation (GIZ), has prepared a draft National Strategy for the Preservation of the Historic Cities, Sites and Monuments 2016 – 2020, (Republic of Yemen, Ministry of Culture, GOPHCY). During 2015, it is proposed that an Action Plan will be developed in line with the strategic objectives of the Strategy.

Local authorities have made approaches to potential donors and supporters seeking urgent assistance.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2015

Regrettably, the security situation in Yemen is preventing both effective heritage management and physical conservation works within the property. Future donor support is therefore necessarily constrained unless and until the security situation improves.

There may be short-term opportunities to put appropriate heritage management documents in place, pending progress with security, site access and donor support.

In 1998, the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee had previously invited the Yemeni authorities to prepare an overall management plan and to consider initiating a large-scale rehabilitation programme in co-operation with potential regional and international partners. These initiatives might potentially be pursued, notwithstanding the security and site access issues.

The preparation of the draft: National Strategy for the Preservation of the Historic Cities, Sites and Monuments 2016 – 2020 is welcome, but it is important that the Action Plan arising from the strategy specifically address this property and include provisions for fostering community support and awareness, and international involvement in heritage management, as well as identification of physical conservation requirements.

It would be desirable for a further Reactive Monitoring mission to visit the property and consider progress with the corrective measures, as soon as the situation allows.

Finally, a report on the state of conservation of the property should be requested for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 40th session, in order to assess the evolution of  the situation in the country and whether the property is facing an ascertained or potential danger.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2015
39 COM 7B.60
Old Walled City of Shibam (Yemen) (C 192)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 22 BUR V.B.72, adopted at the 22nd session of the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee (UNESCO, 1998),
  3. Notes with great concern that the Old Walled City of Shibam is currently subject to significant threats from natural elements, physical changes and a lack of organisational support and material resources for physical conservation projects;
  4. Commends the State Party for the preparation of the draft ‘National Strategy for the Preservation of the Historic Cities, Sites and Monuments 2016 – 2020’ and the proposal for a complementary Action Plan to be developed during 2015 and requests the State Party to ensure that the Action Plan addresses the current situation and include provisions for conservation of damaged buildings, local community awareness and a strategy for attracting international support;
  5. Also requests the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies to advise on the proposal for a complementary Action Plan for the National Strategy for the Preservation of the Historic Cities, Sites and Monuments 2016 – 2020’ to be developed during 2015;
  6. Urges the State Party to work towards preparation of a management plan for the property, in consultation with the World Heritage Centre, in conformity with Decision 22 BUR V.B.72;
  7. Expresses its appreciation for the previous support of Shibam by the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) but expresses its regret at the termination of the Yemini/German collaboration in 2010;
  8. Further requests, the State Party, as soon as it is feasible to do so, given the current security situation, to consider initiating a large-scale rehabilitation programme for the property, in co-operation with potential regional and international partners;
  9. Also decides to inscribe the Old Walled City of Shibam on the World Heritage List in Danger;
  10. Also requests the State Party, as soon as it is feasible and in close consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, to develop a set of corrective measures and a timeframe for their implementation, as well as a Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR);
  11. Requests furthermore the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2016, a report on the state of conservation of the property and on the steps taken to implement the recommendations above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 40th session in 2016.
39 COM 8C.1
Update of the List of the World Heritage in Danger

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined the state of conservation reports of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List (WHC-15/39.COM/7B and WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add) and the proposals for inscription of properties on the World Heritage List (WHC-15/39.COM/8B and WHC-15/39.COM/8B.Add),
  2. Decides to inscribe the following properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger:
  • Iraq, Hatra (Decision 39 COM 7B.51)
  • Yemen, Old City of Sana’a (Decision 39 COM 7B.59)
  • Yemen, Old Walled City of Shibam (Decision 39 COM 7B.60)
Draft Decision: 39 COM 7B.60

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 22 BUR V.B.72, adopted at the 22nd session of the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee (UNESCO, 1998),
  3. Notes with great concern that the Old Walled City of Shibam is currently subject to significant threats from natural elements, physical changes and a lack of organisational support and material resources for physical conservation projects;
  4. Commends the State Party for the preparation of the draft ‘National Strategy for the Preservation of the Historic Cities, Sites and Monuments 2016 – 2020’ and the proposal for a complementary Action Plan to be developed during 2015 and requests the State Party to ensure that the Action Plan addresses the current situation and include provisions for conservation of damaged buildings, local community awareness and a strategy for attracting international support;
  5. Also requests the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies to advise on the proposal for a complementary Action Plan for the National Strategy for the Preservation of the Historic Cities, Sites and Monuments 2016 – 2020’ to be developed during 2015;
  6. Urges the State Party to work towards preparation of a management plan for the property, in consultation with the World Heritage Centre, in conformity with Decision 22 BUR V.B.72;
  7. Expresses its appreciation for the previous support of Shibam by the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) but expresses its regret at the termination of the Yemini/German collaboration in 2010;
  8. Further requests, the State Party, as soon as it is feasible to do so, given the current security situation, to consider initiating a large-scale rehabilitation programme for the property, in co-operation with potential regional and international partners;
  9. Requests furthermore the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2016, a report on the state of conservation of the property and on the steps taken to implement the recommendations above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 40th session in 2016, with a view to considering, in the case of confirmation of the ascertained or potential danger to Outstanding Universal Value, the possible inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2015
Yemen
Date of Inscription: 1982
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iii)(iv)(v)
Danger List (dates): 2015-present
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2015) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 39COM (2015)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top