State of Conservation (SOC)
Ngorongoro Conservation Area
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
USD 50,000 from Switzerland, USD 35,000 from the Netherlands, USD 20,000 from the United Nations Development Assistance Plan (UNDAP) and USD 8,000 self-benefitting funds from the United Republic of Tanzania in 2013-2014.
International Assistance granted to the property
Requests Approved: 0
Total Amount Ap proved: 270,099USD
|2014||Building the capacity of local communities and stakeholders for a ...||0 USD|
|2009||Implementing Management Effectiveness Evaluations into two World ...||14,960 USD|
|2004||The World Heritage site Ngorongoro Conservation Area nominated ...||19,294 USD|
|2001|| Scientific Study in Ngorongoro crater (NOT IMPLEMENTED)
Reapproval: 12 Feb, 2002 (n°1490 - 10,000 USD)
|1999||Purchase of radio calls and solar panels for World Heritage sites||9,713 USD|
|1999|| Project Planning Workshop for Strengthening Institutional ...
Reapproval: 24 Jan, 2001 (n°1368 - 8,883 USD)
|1994||International Conference on Ngorongoro, in Bellagio, Italy|
|1990||Purchase of a Land Rover and radio equipment for the ...||49,782 USD|
|1988||Purchase of 2 vehicles (one tipper truck and one 4x4 pick-up) for ...||50,000 USD|
|1988||Contribution to the purchase of associated spare parts for ...||10,000 USD|
|1987||Purchase of a Land Rover for anti-poaching activities in ...||17,500 USD|
|1987||Participation of a specialist from Ngorongoro Conservation Area ...||4,000 USD|
|1987||Additional costs of equipment for Ngorongoro Conservation Area||2,000 USD|
|1986||Equipment to strengthen the protection of Ngorongoro Conservation ...||20,000 USD|
|1980||Additional financial assistance for the preparation of a ...||7,000 USD|
|1979||Financial grant for establishment of a management plan for ...||24,950 USD|
|1979||12-month fellowship in law/administration for Ngorongoro ...||18,000 USD|
|1979||Drawing up by an architect-museologist of a project for the ...||5,400 USD|
April 1986: IUCN mission; April-May 2007: World Heritage Centre/IUCN reactive monitoring mission; December 2008: World Heritage Centre /IUCN reactive monitoring mission; February 2011: World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission; April 2012: World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/IUCN reactive monitoring mission.
|2012||Joint UNESCO/ICOMOS/IUCN Reactive monitoring mission to Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania), 10th -13th April ...|
|2007||Report of the Reactive Monitoring Mission, 29 April to 5 May 2007|
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
Increased human population;
Spread of invasive species;
Governance of the property;
Challenging situation of community livelihoods.
Current conservation issues
On 31 January 2014, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report. An executive summary of this report is available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/39/documents/. Progress is reported on the following:
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority (NCAA) and the Department of Antiquities signed in September 2013 and budget requests for the cultural department to become operational;
Reports from the partial re-excavation of the Laetoli footprint track way were reviewed in January 2014. An International technical committee meeting will be convened to explore options to ensure the conservation of this significant cultural attribute of the property;
- Activities aimed at reducing the impact of livestock on the property, including development of an experimental farm, livestock improvement, and voluntary re-settlement of some of the pastoralists elsewhere;
- A 3-year project, initiated in the second half of 2013, to improve dialogue and involvement of the local communities in decision-making over land-use, benefit-sharing and other issues arising from World Heritage listing;
- Ongoing management efforts aimed at addressing recommendations of the 2012 Reactive Monitoring Mission in respect of (1) finding a suitable road surfacing technique for the main road traversing the property which serves Serengeti and areas beyond, (2) controlling invasive plant species, (3) poaching, particularly as this affects elephants and rhino and (4) monitoring;
- A commitment by the State Party to ensure that technical and regulatory documents, including Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA), are submitted to the World Heritage Centre in draft form for review by the Advisory Bodies;
- Integration of a cultural tourism strategy in the existing Management Plan although no further details are provided on whether this strategy has been developed.
Analysis and Conclusion
The State Party has achieved some progress in addressing some of the recommendations of the 2012 reactive monitoring mission and the success of intensified anti-poaching efforts is reflected in reducing the number of elephants lost in recent months. The progress made in controlling invasive plant species within the property is also noted but no further information is provided on the status of Parthenium hysterophorus, an invasive weed potentially devastating for the grasslands and consequently grazing wildlife species as well as the livestock of the pastoralist communities.
The State Party has also made efforts in evaluating road-surfacing options for the heavily used main road through the property, and it is considered that prior to a decision on hardening this road, an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) should be carried out in cooperation with Tanzania National Parks and according to IUCN’s World Heritage Advice Note on Environmental Assessment. The EIA should assess the impacts of the different options on both Ngorongoro Conservation Area and the Serengeti National Park, and be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review before a decision is taken.
Whilst acknowledging efforts undertaken by the management authority to address the impacts of livestock and of the increasing population pressure on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, an overall strategy to address these issues and reassess the usefulness of existing and planned projects needs to be developed in close cooperation with the different stakeholders and in particular the resident communities. Noting the importance of the dialogue, which has recently been initiated between the authorities, the local communities living in the property and other relevant stakeholders with assistance of UNESCO, it is recommended that the Committee encourage the State Party to use this process as an opportunity to review wide-ranging governance issues, including stakeholder involvement and benefit sharing, and to identify adequate options for sustainable livelihoods that do not compromise the exceptional resources of the property.
An independent report has been received concerning the allocation of a new lodge development site in an ecologically-sensitive location on the crater rim. A letter was sent to the State Party on 18 October 2013 to request more information on the project but at the time of writing of this report, no reply had been received. It is recommended that the Committee express its concern over the potential impact of any such development on the OUV of the property, and to request the State Party to provide more information, including a copy of the EIA for the project.
There is some concern about the advanced state of the proposals submitted by the State Party for a museum building at Laetoli, which would apparently involve the re-opening of the Laetoli footprints. It is recommended that the Committee request the State Party as a matter of urgency to halt all on-going action related to the re-opening of the trackway, or the construction of the adjacent museum, until a full technical review is carried-out and a technical workshop is held with the stakeholders, State Party, Advisory Bodies and UNESCO in order to evaluate options for the long-term conservation of these crucially important attributes of OUV and to develop a conservation strategy as previously agreed with the State Party.
Finally, it is noted that very limited progress has been achieved on the conservation and management of the cultural attributes of the property. While the setting up of an operational cultural department is an important step, there are many issues that have yet to be addressed, as requested by the Committee at the time of inscription as a mixed property. Sustained efforts will be required to carry out the mapping of the archaeo-anthropological sites, and to address the conservation of sites, including erosion at Olduvai, protection at Nasera and identifying the appropriate course of action for the Laetoli footprint trackway.
Draft Decision: 38 COM 7B.61
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/7B,
2. Recalling Decision 36 COM 7B.35 adopted at its 36th session (Saint-Petersburg, 2012),
3. Commends the State Party for the progress achieved in addressing the escalating threat of poaching, particularly affecting elephant populations;
4. Welcomes the establishment of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority (NCAA) and the Department of Antiquities and the proposed integration of the cultural department in the operational structure of the property, and urges the State Party to implement these proposals and ensure that adequate resources are secured for its long-term operation;
5. Reiterates is concern about the impacts of livestock grazing and increased population pressure on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, and considers that existing and planned measures be reviewed and an overall strategy be developed to address these issues in close cooperation with the different stakeholders and in particular the resident communities;
6. Also welcomes the initiation of a dialogue process with the local communities of the property aimed at improving stakeholder involvement in decision-making over land-use, identification of sustainable livelihoods, benefit-sharing and other issues, and encourages the State Party to use this process as an opportunity to review wide-ranging governance issues, including management and conservation approaches, stakeholder involvement and benefit sharing, and to identify adequate options for sustainable livelihoods that do not negatively impact on the OUV of the property;
7. Notes the efforts made in evaluating road-surfacing options for the heavily used main road through the property, and requests the State Party to carry out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in cooperation with Tanzania National Parks, to assess the impacts of the different options on Ngorongoro Conservation Area and the Serengeti National Park, and to submit it to the World Heritage Centre for review prior to making a decision on how to stabilize this road;
8. Also encourages the State Party to sustain efforts to implement the recommendations of the 2012 reactive monitoring mission with particular reference to road surface improvements, a road development strategy, control of invasive species and implementation of monitoring programmes;
9. Expresses its concern at the advanced state of the Museum building at Laetoli for which no detailed plans nor appropriate Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) have been submitted to the World Heritage Centre; and that the museum proposals have apparently been finalised in advance of a technical review workshop on conservation options for the Laetoli footprints;
10. Also requests the State Party to submit the outcomes of the International Technical Committee meeting for Laetoli to be held in May 2014 to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before making any commitments to their implementation; and to halt the Laetoli museum project until an agreed approach for the conservation of the footprints has been achieved;
11. Also notes that limited progress has been achieved regarding the cultural components of the property and reiterates its request to address the current conditions of the cultural components of the property, as requested in Decision 34 COM 8B.13, paragraph 6;
12. Further expresses its concern about the potential impacts on the OUV of the property from a lodge development project on the crater rim, and further requests the State Party to provide more information on this project, including a copy of the EIA, in accordance with IUCN’s World Heritage Advice Note on Environmental Assessment;
13. Acknowledges the commitment of the State Party to submit copies of relevant technical and regulatory documents for review by the Advisory Bodies and requests furthermore the State Party to provide an electronic and three printed copies of the draft revised management plan, the proposed cultural tourism strategy, the draft building codes, the draft road development strategy and other relevant documents for review by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies as soon as they are available, and not later than 1 February 2015;
14. Requests moreover the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2015, an updated report, including a 1-page executive summary, on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 39th session in 2015.
Ngorongoro Conservation Area
- Crop production
- Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
- Illegal activities
- Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
- Invasive/alien terrestrial species
- Land conversion
- Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
Inscription on the Danger List
Threats to the Site:
Shortcomings in the management and protection of the property
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).