jump to the content
Advanced search

State of Conservation (SOC)

Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1983)

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0 (from1979-1980)
Total Amount Ap proved: 55,350USD

1980   Additional financial assistance for the preparation of a ...   7,000  USD
1979   Financial grant for establishment of a management plan for ...   24,950  USD
1979   12-month fellowship in law/administration for Ngorongoro ...   18,000  USD
1979   Drawing up by an architect-museologist of a project for the ...   5,400  USD
Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues

[Oral report]

The representative of IUCN informed the Committee of the serious short-comings in the management of the Ngorongoro Conservation Area. 

 

Conclusion

The Committee asked the Secretariat to communicate with the Government of Tanzania in order to initiate the procedure  for including this property in the List of World Heritage in Danger. 

Decision

  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

No draft decision proposed.

Ngorongoro Conservation Area
State Party:
Tanzania, United Republic of
Date of Inscription: 1979
Nomination records (Year): 2007, 1978, 2009, 2006
Category: Mixed
Criteria: (iv)(vii)(viii)(ix)(x)
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
2012
2011
2010
2009
2007
2006
2005
2004
1994
1993
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
Threats*
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other Threats:
Documents
SC.83/CONF.009/8
Other Documents:
View inscribed site documents, nomination file, reports, decisions, ...
SOC ID: 1520
Inscription on the Danger List
Year: 1984 -1989
Threats to the Site:

Shortcomings in the management and protection of the property 


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.