jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

Royal Palaces of Abomey (2005)

Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0 (from1985-1997)
Total Amount Ap proved: 113,000USD

1997   Royal Palaces of Abomey   20,000  USD
1995   ICCROM/Abomey Palace: analysis of architectural archives to ...   20,000  USD
1994   ICCROM/CRATerre: Training for a professional team and a ...   33,000  USD
1989   Financial contribution to the restoration works on the Royal ...   20,000  USD
1985   Financial contribution to restoration works concerning the Royal ...   20,000  USD
Missions**

Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS mission in May 2004.

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

- Absence of national legislation for cultural heritage protection;

- Absence of delimitation and protection measures for the buffer zone of the property;

- Management plan not yet updated;

- Serious degradation of nearly 2/3 of the mud-brick constructions.

Corrective Measures

a) finalize the national legislative and administrative mechanism for the protection of Cultural heritage in Benin,

b) to establish new boundarieis of the property and clearly define the buffer zone which aims to protect its integrity,

c) evaluate and update the conservation and management plan of the property,

d) pursue restoration and conservation activities to cover at least half of the remaining structural components of the property considered to be in a serious deterioration

Current conservation issues

Following the conclusions of the World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS evaluation mission in May 2004, the Committee, in its Decision 28 COM 15A.14, encouraged the State Party to implement a number of measures that would enable the property to be removed from the List of World Heritage in Danger, in 2007. These measures included setting up a national mechanism for cultural heritage protection, the establishment of a buffer zone around the property, an update of the management plan, and the continuation of conservation actions for the protection of the last vestiges of mud-brick construction. The Chairperson of the World Heritage Committee visited the site in November 2004 to evaluate the state of conservation, and was informed of the preparation of the cultural heritage law that would be submitted to the Parliament for vote. He seized the opportunity of this visit to remind the Benin authorities of the urgent need to implement the measures that had been recommended by the Committee, and reported on his visit to the President of the Republic of Benin.

On 10 March 2005, the State Party submitted a request for international assistance to implement the recommendations of the Committee’s Decision 28 COM 15A.14. The requested financial assistance will enable the State Party to carry out the delimitation of the buffer zone and to sign a municipal decree regulating development and construction around the property, to evaluate the management plan which had expired and to organise a technical expert mission. This technical mission, composed of specialists of mud-brick heritage conservation, will develop the future conservation project for the last vestiges of mud-brick construction. The State Party intends to invite the Getty Conservation Institute, CRATerre-EAG and the World Heritage Centre to participate in this mission.

Furthermore, from 5 to 13 April 2005, the World Heritage Centre organised a technical assistance mission in the framework of the cooperation agreement between Italy and UNESCO, aimed at alleviating the site from its endangered situation. The objective of this mission was to assist the State Party in developing a project for the promotion of sustainable tourism, with a view to increasing income and financing some of the costs for the maintenance and conservation work. The project proposal will be submitted to different funding institutions.  

Conclusion
Decision
  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

29COM7A.13
Link to the decision

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7A,

2. Recalling Decision 28 COM 15A.14, adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004),

3. Encourages the State Party of Benin to pursue the search for funding in order to implement all the measures defined by the Committee at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004);

4. Invites the international community to support the State Party in its efforts towards removing the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger;

5. Decides to maintain the Royal Palaces of Abomey (Benin) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

Draft decision: 29 COM 7A.13

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7A,

2. Recalling Decision 28 COM 15A.14, adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004),

3. Encourages the State Party to pursue the search for funding in order to implement all the measures defined by the Committee at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004);

4. Invites the international community to support the State Party in its efforts towards removing the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger;

5. Decides to maintain the Royal Palaces of Abomey on the List of World Heritage in Danger. 

Royal Palaces of Abomey
State Party:
Benin
Date of Inscription: 1985
Nomination records (Year): 1984, 2007
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iii)(iv)
Danger List: Yes
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
2012
2010
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
1994
1985
Threats*
  • Legal framework
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other Threats:
    Serious degradation of nearly 2/3 of the mud-brick constructions
Inscription on the Danger List
Year: 1985 -2007
Threats to the Site:

The site was inscribed simultaneously on the World Heritage List and on the List of the World Heritage in Danger in 1985, after a tornado struck Abomey on 15 March 1984.

According to a report at the time, the royal enclosure and museums (particularly the Guezo Portico, the Assins Room, King Glèlè's Tomb and Jewel Room) had suffered extensive damage. Since 1984, several conservation programs have done effective work at the site.



* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.