Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Administration
Budget
Capacity Building
Communication
Community
Conservation
Credibility of the World Heritage ...
Inscriptions on the World Heritage ...
International Assistance
List of World Heritage in Danger
Operational Guidelines
Outstanding Universal Value
Partnerships
Periodic Reporting
Reinforced Monitoring
Reports
Tentative Lists
Working methods and tools
World Heritage Convention








65 Decisions
0 Resolutions
Year start: 1988close
Year end: 1988close
By Year
Xanthos-Letoon 484 Turkey C(ii)(iii) The Committee was pleased to note the assurances of the Turkish authorities to protect the site within a larger perimeter.
Hierapolis-Pamukkale 485 Turkey C(iii)(iv) N(iii) The Committee was pleased to note that the Turkish Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Affairs has decided to start work on setting up a national park during 1989. Furthermore, the Committee accepted the ICOMOS proposal to add natural criterion (iii) to cultural criteria.
The Tower of London 488 United Kingdom C(ii)(iv) The Committee has expressed its regrets regarding the building of the Tower Hotel, which would have best been avoided, and took note of the assurances of the United Kingdom authorities as to protection henceforth to be granted to the environment of the Tower of London. The Committee further suggested that inscription on the World Heritage List be extended to the Tower Bridge which constitutes a coherent whole with the Tower of London.
Trinidad and the Valley de los Ingenios 460 Cuba C(iv)(v) The Committee congratulated the Cuban authorities on conservation of the Trinidad historical site. However, it strongly recommended to protect the environment of the town, sugar mills and valley which should not suffer from tourism development.
Wet Tropics of Queensland 486 Australia  N(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) In accordance with the wishes of the Bureau at its last meeting in June 1988, the Committee noted that the Bureau had re-examined this nomination taking into account the revised evaluation of IUCN and additional information provided by Australia, as requested by the Bureau. Following this re-examination, the Committee decided to inscribe this property on the World Heritage List. It recommended that an appropriate management regime be established. The Committee furthermore recommended that IUCN continue to monitor the ...
b) Furthermore, the Committee decided to defer the inscription of the following nomination: Spanish Town 459 rev Jamaica The Committee decided to defer inscription of this property on the World Heritage List to enable the competent authorities to refine the protection plan and define the principles of an overall conservation policy for the historic centre.
The Committee noted that the nomination of the Bemaraha Strict Nature Reserve and adjacent forests, submitted by Madagascar, had been deferred by the Bureau and that this nomination would be re-worked on the occasion of a training workshop to be held in Madagascar in early 1989 with the financial support from the World Heritage Fund.
a) The Committee endorsed the recommendations of the Bureau and decided to defer the examination of the following nominations: Male Hukuru Miskiy 461 (Maldives) Utheemu Gaduvaru 462 (Maldives) Eid Miskiy 463 (Maldives) Fenfushi Hukuru Miskiy 464 (Maldives) Vadhoo Hukuru Miskiy 465 (Maldives) New Lanark 429 (United Kingdom) Pueblo of Taos 492 (United States of America)
Djoudj National Park (Senegal) The Committee recalled that under the agenda item on monitoring the state of conservation of World Heritage properties the Committee had decided to comply with the request of the Senegalese authorities to remove this property from the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Port Royal 457 rev Jamaica The Committee recognized the importance of this property for the national heritage of Jamaica but felt that the nomination did not meet the criteria for inscription on the World Heritage List.
Seville   458 rev Jamaica The Committee recognized the importance of this property for the national heritage of Jamaica but felt that the nomination did not meet the criteria for inscription on the World Heritage List.
top