State of Conservation
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Need for consolidation and conservation measures of the hydraulic work |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Weaknesses in quarantine measures; b) Passage of international and national marine traffic |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.204/INF.9,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.201/INF.13,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the civil architecture |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Steady deterioration of the city's pysical environment; Large-scale rehabilitation project for the Hermitage |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Extensive cracks and leaning walls |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Extensive cracks and leaning walls |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1987 |
Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Fires |
States Parties: | Bolivia (Plurinational State of) |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Risk to humans posed by the dingo population |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Natural erosion, b) Dilapidation, c) Lack of maintenance |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Australia Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Cambodia Central African Republic Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Dominican Republic Ecuador Ethiopia Germany Greece Guatemala Guinea Haiti Honduras India Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Mali Malta Mexico Morocco Nepal Niger North Macedonia Oman Pakistan Peru Romania Russian Federation Slovenia Solomon Islands Spain Sri Lanka Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)Threats
Legal framework 135
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.