Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

600
Reports
132
Properties concerned
79
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2017close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Historic Centre of the City of Salzburg (2009)
States Parties: Austria
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Centre of the City of Salzburg (2008)
States Parties: Austria
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Centre of the City of Salzburg (2007)
States Parties: Austria
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Centre of the Town of Goiás (2004)
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Centre of Vienna (2009)
States Parties: Austria
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Centre of Vienna (2008)
States Parties: Austria
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Centres of Berat and Gjirokastra (2017)
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Lack of adequate fire fighting arrangements in the historic urban zone
Historic City of Meknes (2000)
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa (2016)
States Parties: China
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa (2014)
States Parties: China
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Monuments of Ancient Nara (2011)
States Parties: Japan
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Monuments of Ancient Nara (2009)
States Parties: Japan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Monuments of Ancient Nara (2008)
States Parties: Japan
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Monuments of Ancient Nara (2007)
States Parties: Japan
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Monuments of Ancient Nara (2006)
States Parties: Japan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Monuments of Ancient Nara (2004)
States Parties: Japan
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Monuments of Ancient Nara (2003)
States Parties: Japan
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (2010)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (2003)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (2002)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/INF.10
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Australia Austria Bahrain Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Canada Central African Republic Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Gabon Germany Greece Guinea Haiti Honduras Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lithuania Malta Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Nigeria North Macedonia Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Romania Russian Federation Senegal Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Thailand Türkiye Uganda Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uzbekistan Viet Nam Yemen
Threats
Ground transport infrastructure 600

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top